Waching daily May 27 2017

BEN AND JERRY'S NOT ONLY HAS DELICIOUS ICE CREAM BUT THEY

USE THEIR BUSINESS TO ADVOCATE FOR CERTAIN SOCIAL MOVEMENTS.

IN AUSTRALIA, SOCIAL MOVEMENT THAT THEY WANT TO PUSH FOR

IS MARRIAGE EQUALITY.

APPARENTLY, THE SENATE AND AUSTRALIA RECENTLY VOTED TO NOT

SUPPORT SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND AS A RESULT, BEN & JERRY'S WANTED

TO GET INVOLVED I KEEP IN MIND, THAT THEY HAD 26 STORES TOTAL IN

AUSTRALIA, BUT THEY WANTED TO USE WHATEVER POWER THEY HAVE IN

THAT COUNTRY IN ORDER TO MAKE A STATEMENT AND SO HERE'S

WHAT THEY'RE DOING.

BEN & JERRY'S SAID IT'S BANNING ITS USHERING CUSTOMERS FROM

BUYING TWO SCOOPS OF THE SAME LAYER OF ICE CREAM AND SO

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IS LEGALIZED ACROSS THE COUNTRY.

THEY HAVE ASKED AUSTRALIANS IN A STATEMENT TO IMAGINE HOW

FURIOUS HE WOULD BE IF YOU WERE TOLD YOU WERE NOT ALLOWED

TO MARRY THE PERSON YOU LOVE.

WE ARE BANNING TWO SCOOPS OF THE SAME FLAVOR IN ENCOURAGING OUR

FANS TO CONTACT THEIR MPS AND TELL THEM THAT TIME HAS

COME, MAKE MARRIAGE EQUALITY LEGAL.

PROGRESSIVE ICE CREAM.

I FEEL LIKE THEY ARE ACTUALLY DOING AUSTRALIANS A FAVOR.

IF YOU GET TWO SCOOPS, IT SHOULD BE A CRIME TO GET TWO OF

THE SAME FLAVORED, ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU ARE HAVING BEN &

JERRY'S ICE CREAM WHICH IS DELICIOUS AND THEY ARE JUST

A VARIETY OF TASTY TREATS.

HAVE YOU SEEN SAY VERSE WORLD I WAS CLIMATE CHANGE THE

THAT AND HAVE THAT WHEN THE

WHAT WERE THE FLAVORS, DO YOU REMEMBER?

THINK IT WAS THE NOAH AND CHOCOLATE CHUNKS BECAUSE ON THE

CONTAINER THE COWS WERE ON THESE ICE CUPS THAT WERE MELTING.

IT WAS CUTE THE HEART IS IN THE RIGHT PLACE IT IS JUST SO

STUPID.

THEY HAVE A SOCIAL MISSION.

NOT JUST MAKING MONEY THAT YOU

WERE JUST TALKING ABOUT HOW COMPANIES DON'T CARE.

WHAT THEY ARE DOING -

IT JUST DOESN'T FEEL LIKE IT LANDS BUT GOD BLESS THEM.

HAVE AT IT, IT'S YOUR COMPANY, DO WHAT YOU LIKE.

ITíS PUBLIC PUBLICLY TRADED.

THEYíRE DOING GOOD THINGS.

I LOVE IT, BUT YOU GET ONE SCOOP, ITíS SO MUCH ICE CREAM.

IT REALLY IS.

HOW CAN YOU EAT IT?

YOU CAN EVEN GET TO THE CONE?

AND HE HAS HAVE A BROWNIE UNDERNEATH?

YOU HAVE TO REALLY GO IN FOR DESSERT.

ONLY I KNOW HOW TO EAT ICE CREAM.

HOW DO YOU DO IT.

THE SUGAR CONE AND IT'S ONE SCOOP.

THAT'S

PLENTY BECAUSE YOU HAVE TO GET TO THE CONE BEFORE ALL THE

ICE CREAM MELTS.

I'M WITH BEN.

WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT IS A SUNDAE.

THAT'S TWO SCOOPS AND A BROWNIE THING.

WITH ALL THE SYRUPY CRAP AND SPRINKLES AND GUMMIES.

THAT IS A SUNDAE NOT AN ICE CREAM CONE.

GUMMIES?

THAT'S DISGUSTING.

YOU KNOW

WHAT ELSE IS GROSS, SORRY TO MY DAUGHTER.

SPRINKLES ARE DISGUSTING.

THEY ARE.

YES.

FINALLY SOMEONE HAS HAD THE COURAGE TO SAY THAT BECAUSE

THEY ARE DISGUSTING.

THEY ARE SMUGGLING'S SPRINKLES ON THE BACKS OF PIGEONS.

THIS IS SHORTAGE OF THEM.

PEOPLE PROBABLY GO TO THE MALL IN LAREDO TO GET SPRINKLES

AND YOU TAKE THEM FOR GRANTED.

SEE HOW WE TIE EVERYTHING TOGETHER?

THIS IS A BIG FINISH.

POOR JOSIE HAS TO SMUGGLE THE SPRINKLES INTO THE HOUSE

BECAUSE OF BEN.

TOTALLY.

EVERY TIME SHE HAS I SAY THAT'S DISGUSTING.

GETTING BACK TO THE POINT,

PEOPLE SHOULD BE ABLE TO GET MARRIED WHOEVER THEY LOVE.

I'M GLAD THAT THEY ARE TAKING A STANCE.

ITíS SURPRISING BECAUSE AUSTRAILIA IS LIBERAL.

KIND OF INTERESTING.

YOU'RE RIGHT, THEY ARE AT LEAST ON THIS ISSUE, THE

MAJORITY OF AUSTRALIANS POLLED INDICATED THAT THEY ARE IN

FAVOR OF MARRIAGE EQUALITY SO IT IS A LITTLE WEIRD THAT THE

SENATE REJECTED A REFERENDUM ON SAME-SEX MARRIAGE BUT I

THINK THEY ARE EVENTUALLY GOING TO GET THERE AND THEY WILL

EVENTUALLY GET THERE BY PEOPLE VOICING THEIR OPINION ON

SOMETHING, SUPPORTING THE LGBT COMMUNITY AND EVEN IF BEN &

JERRY'S IS DOING THIS IN SOMEWHAT OF A SILLY WAY,

THEY ARE STILL VOCALIZING SOMETHING THAT IS IMPORTANT.

THAT IS WHAT IS IMPORTANT THAT

GOT US TALKING ABOUT IT.

GOD BLESS START

BY THE WAY IT'S WILD, YOU ARE SAYING THAT THE POPULACE IN

OVERWHELMING NUMBERS DOESN'T APPROVE SOMETHING OR DOES

APPROVE SOMETHING IN THIS CASE, SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AT THE

GOVERNMENT DECIDES THAT THEY ONCE OUTLAWED.

SIMILARLY AS I RECALL, THE POPULACE OF THIS COUNTRY WAS

OVERWHELMINGLY AGAINST THE IRAQI WAR GET WE WENT TO WAR IN IRAQ.

SO IT HAPPENS WORLDWIDE EVERYBODY.

THE POPULATION CAN BE AGAINST HER FOR SOMETHING, THE

GOVERNMENT DOES WITH THEIR CORPORATE OVERLORD SELDOM TO DO.

THAT SAID, WE HAVE TO REMEMBER THOUGH THE

SOMETIMES GOVERNMENT MAKES THE RIGHT CALL.

THERE WAS A LONG TIME IN THIS COUNTRY WERE BLACK PEOPLE

COULDN'T MARRY WHITE PEOPLE IN OVERWHELMING MAJORITY OF

AMERICANS THOUGHT IT WAS RIGHT.

I HAVE TWO SWIRLS AT HOME TO PROVE IT.

TWO SWIRL KIDS.

CHOCOLATE AND VANILLA.

THAT IS CRAZY TO THINK ABOUT THOUGH.

HOW RECENTLY, NOT LONG AGO IT WAS OUTLAWED TO BE IN AN

INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE.

IT IS ABSURD.

THIS IS THE 80TH

ANNIVERSARY OF LOVING VERSUS VIRGINIA AND MUCH OF THE COUNTRY

THAT WAS ILLEGAL AND ESTATE ILLEGAL IN SOME STATES BECAUSE

SOME STATES REFUSED TO COMPLY WITH THE SUPREME COURT ORDER.

DON'T WORRY.

ITíS COMING.

BEN &

JERRY'S IS LEADING THE WAY.

For more infomation >> Why Ben & Jerry's Is Banning Scoops - Duration: 5:53.

-------------------------------------------

Gianforte Wins Election After Body Slamming Reporter - Duration: 13:28.

EVEN THOUGH GREG GIANFORTE WAS CHARGED WITH MISDEMEANOR

ASSAULT TWO NIGHTS AGO, IT TURNS OUT HE DID WIN THE SPECIAL

ELECTION IN MONTANA AND IS NOW A U.S. HOUSE REPRESENTATIVE.

FOR

THOSE OF YOU WHO MIGHT HAVE MISSED THIS STORY, HE PULLED OF

VICTORY DESPITE HIS ALLEGED ASSAULT OF A REPORTER WEDNESDAY

NIGHT AT HIS CAMPAIGN HEADQUARTERS --

KEEP IN MIND THAT A LOT OF THE VOTES, OR A LOT OF THE

BALLOTS, HAD BEEN TURNED IN EARLY, WE WILL GET INTO THE

NUMBERS IN A SECOND.

SO PEOPLE HAD ALREADY VOTED BEFORE THIS

INCIDENT MADE HEADLINES, BUT --

THAT WAS NOT TRUE, THE AUDIO RECORDING THAT JACOBS HAD

REINFORCED HIS STORY, AND THERE WAS ALSO A FOX NEWS REPORTER

THERE WHO SAW WHAT HAPPENED AND ALSO AGREE WITH JACOBS.

AN ENTIRE FOX CREW, NOT JUST THE REPORTER.

YES, AND THE REPORTER CORROBORATED THE ACCOUNT GIVEN

BY JACOBS.

WITH THAT SAID, UNFORTUNATELY GIANFORTE STILL

WON, AND AFTER HE WON HE MADE A STATEMENT AND AN APOLOGY IN

REGARD TO THE ASSAULT SITUATION.

LAST NIGHT I LEARNED A LESSON.

AND -- PLEASE -- I NEED

TO SHARE SOMETHING FROM MY HEART HERE, AND I ASK YOU TO BEAR WITH

ME.

WHEN YOU MAKE A MISTAKE, YOU HAVE TO OWN UP TO IT.

THAT'S THE

MONTANA WAY.

LAST NIGHT I MADE A MISTAKE, AND I TOOK AN ACTION

THAT I CAN'T TAKE BACK, AND I'M NOT PROUD OF WHAT HAPPENED.

I SHOULD NOT HAVE RESPONDED IN THE WAY THAT I DID, AND FOR

THAT I'M SORRY.

AND YOU'RE FORGIVEN!

GLAD HE DIDN'T HAVE ANY FIREARMS AVAILABLE, IT WOULD'VE

BEEN A HORRIBLE MISTAKE.

FIRST THE MONTANA WAY IS THAT YOU LIKE ABOUT IT AND SAY

IT DIDN'T GO DOWN, AND ONCE YOU GET SUFFICIENT POLITICAL

PRESSURE PLACED UPON YOU, THEN YOU OWN UP TO IT.

WHEN THERE IS NO DANGER IN ANY WAY IN ISSUING THE APOLOGY.

THERE IS DANGER, HE'S STILL FACING CRIMINAL CHARGES.

BUT IT DOESN'T REALLY MATTER BECAUSE THERE ARE ONLY

THREE QUALIFICATIONS FOR HIS JOB.

HE IS 25, HE RESIDES IN MONTANA, AND HE IS A U.S. CITIZEN.

SO THERE IS NOTHING THAT WILL DISQUALIFY HIM WITH THIS CHARGE.

AND ITS MISDEMEANOR ASSAULT, NOT FELONY ASSAULT.

SO IT'S NOT

LIKE HE WILL BE TAKEN AWAY FROM HIS JOB TO DO TIME.

HE COULD STILL SERVE IN HIS POSITION FROM JAIL, THAT'S

HAPPENED BEFORE.

BUT THERE WILL BE NO JAIL BECAUSE ITS MISDEMEANOR ASSAULT,

IN ALL LIKELIHOOD.

AND AS A PRACTICAL MATTER HE DIDN'T ADMIT TO ANYTHING

SPECIFIC, HE JUST THAT I DID SOMETHING.

SO HE LEFT THE DOOR OPEN SHOULD IT TURN INTO A LEGAL CATFIGHT.

HE COULD SAY I WAS APOLOGIZING FOR LOSING MY TEMPER AND NOT

HANDLING IT IN THE RIGHT WAY.

BEING ASSAULTED BY THE WRIST.

THE GUY WAS HOLDING A TAPE RECORDER, I GUESS HE HELD IT TO

HIS WRIST WITH ONE HAND AND THEN GRABBED GIANFORTE'S WRIST WITH

THE OTHER HAND, THAT SEEMS LIKE A LOGICAL HUMAN MOVE, I'M

ALWAYS DOING THIS.

ALWAYS WRESTLING WITH PEOPLE YOU ARE TRYING TO GET TO

ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS.

FOR ANA, YOU KNOW FOR AS LONG AS YOU DON'T ME I LOVE TO TALK

ABOUT APOLOGIES AND HOW BAD APOLOGIES ARE.

THAT IS AN

ALL-TIME BAD APOLOGY, IT DOES A GREAT DISSERVICE TO SEAN CONNERY

WITH IT'S THE MONTANA WAY.

HE DIDN'T EVEN SAY THAT IN A COOL WAY.

YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT THE CHICAGO WAY?

IT'S THE CHICAGO WAY.

IS APOLOGY IS ONE THING, BUT WHAT WAS ALSO WORRISOME IS THE

RESPONSE FROM HIS SUPPORTERS, AND THEIR LACK OF CONCERN OVER

THE ASSAULT THAT OCCURRED, THE TREATMENT OF REPORTERS, THIS

LACK OF I GUESS INTEREST IN PROTECTING REPORTERS' RIGHTS,

OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, THE FIRST AMENDMENT.

IF THIS HAD

HAPPENED TO A REPORTER FROM FOX NEWS, A CONSERVATIVE REPORTER, I

WOULD VENTURE TO SAY THAT THIS WOULD BE SOMETHING REPUBLICANS

WOULD BE RANTING AND RAVING ABOUT NONSTOP FOR THE NEXT

MONTH.

THEY DON'T CARE ABOUT THE CONSTITUTION, THEY DON'T CARE

ABOUT FREEDOM OF PRESS -- FIRST OF ALL, THE ASSUMPTION WAS THAT

THIS WAS A LIBERAL REPORTER, EVEN THOUGH HE DIDN'T EVEN KNOW

WHO THE REPORTER WAS, HE HAD TO ASK WHICH PUBLICATION HE WAS

FROM.

SO HOW ARE YOU ALREADY ASSUMING IT'S A LIBERAL

REPORTER?

AND NONETHELESS IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT THE REPORTER'S

IDEOLOGY IS, YOU DON'T GET ASSAULT THAT REPORTER, OR

ANYONE.

IMAGINE IF WHAT GIANFORTE AND HIS MINIONS HAD SAID WAS

ACTUALLY TRUE.

SUPPOSE THE REPORTER HAD ASSAULTED A MAN

RUNNING FOR CONGRESS, THEY WOULD STILL BE TALKING ABOUT IT.

BUT

HERE THE GUY WITH ALL THE POWER COMMITTED THE ASSAULT, NOT ONLY

DO THEY LIE ABOUT IT, HE BLAMED THE VICTIM.

AND THEN HIS AIDES

BRAGGED THAT OVER THE LAST 24 HOURS THEY RAISED SOMETHING LIKE

$100,000, IS THAT THE NUMBER I READ?

TENS OF THOUSANDS OF

DOLLARS, I THINK 100,000, AND CLAIMED THAT THEY RAISED IT ON

THAT.

SO THEY USED THE ASSAULT TO GENERATE MONEY, BLAME THE

VICTIM, AND THEN ISSUE AN APOLOGY FOR NOTHING THAT DOESN'T

INCLUDE THE PART WHERE I COMPLETELY LIED ABOUT IT TO YOUR

FACES, AND ONLY WHEN THERE WERE WITNESSES THAT I RECANT AND

BLAME THE PERSON WHO I ACTUALLY ASSAULTED WHO MERCIFULLY APPEARS

TO ONLY HAVE BROKEN HIS GLASSES AND SLIGHTLY INJURED HIS ELBOW.

AND TO ANA'S POINT YOU HEAR THIS LAUGHTER ABOUT IT, AND HE

MAINTAINS A SOLEMNITY BECAUSE HE'S TRYING TO SELL THAT

APOLOGY, AS BEN SAYS, MAYBE NOT SUCH A GREAT APOLOGY, AND EVEN

AS HE'S TRYING TO SELL IT THERE IS MORE LAUGHTER IN THE ROOM.

AND THE OTHER ASPECT OF THIS, I THINK VOX DID A PIECE ON THIS

TODAY, THE MACHO THAT WE CELEBRATE IN AMERICA CAN BRING

ABOUT A SUPPORT AND A FRENZY IT'S REALLY NOT HEALTHY FOR

THIS COUNTRY.

IT ISN'T, BECAUSE I ALSO FIND IT INCREDIBLY IRONIC THAT THE

SAME POLITICAL PARTY THAT IS SO DISTRUSTFUL OF THE GOVERNMENT

WANTS TO TAKE DOWN THE SAME PEOPLE THAT ARE SUPPOSED TO BE

SPEAKING TRUTH TO POWER, REPORTING ON THE FACTS.

DO THEY

THINK STATE-SPONSORED MEDIA IS BETTER?

THEY THINK MEDIA IS THE

ENEMY BECAUSE MEDIA DOESN'T CONSTANTLY TELL THEM WHAT THEY

WANT TO HEAR.

IF YOU THINK MEDIA IS THE ENEMY AND WANT TO DO AWAY

WITH INDEPENDENT REPORTERS, REPORTERS WHO ARE TIED TO THE

GOVERNMENT, WHAT DO YOU WANT?

YOU THINK STATE-SPONSORED MEDIA

IS A GOOD IDEA?

THEY ARE JUST SO INCREDIBLY -- THE WAY THEY VIEW

THINGS IS SO SHORTSIGHTED AND IRRESPONSIBLE AND GOES AGAINST

THE CONSTITUTION, AND I DON'T KNOW IF THEY ARE EVEN AWARE OF

THAT.

I DON'T KNOW IF THEY REALIZE WHAT THEY ARE ADVOCATING

FOR WHILE THEY ARE CELEBRATING THE ASSAULT OF A JOURNALIST.

I THINK HE JUST GOT A LITTLE AHEAD OF HIMSELF AND HE DID WHAT

HE DID AND THEN HE WAS LIKE, UGH -- NOW THEY ARE KIND OF USING IT

AS HIS PLATFORM.

I THINK HIS CAREER WILL BE AS BRIGHT AS HE

HOPES, MAYBE HIS GOVERNORSHIP THAT HE WANTED WON'T HAPPEN,

THEY WILL HIDE HIM.

THAT'S EMBARRASSING.

EVEN IF HIS PEOPLE ARE LAUGHING AND THEY ARE MAKING MONEY,

IT WILL BE EMBARRASSING FOR THE REST OF THE PEOPLE HE IS

SERVING WITH.

I WOULD HAVE SAID THAT MAYBE A COUPLE YEARS AGO, BUT I THINK

WE'VE SEEN PERHAPS THE ULTIMATE EMBARRASSMENT, WHICH WAS THE

TRUMP ACCESS HOLLYWOOD TAPE, AND IT'S BULLETPROOF TO THOSE WHO

SUPPORTED HIM.

SIMILARLY HERE I THINK IN MONTANA THOSE

SUPPORTERS, AND THEY ARE SUBSTANTIAL IN NUMBER, WILL LOOK

PAST THIS INCIDENT.

SO WILL THOSE COLLEAGUES IN WASHINGTON.

THEY DON'T CARE,

THIS WILL BE OVER, IT WON'T MATTER.

WE'VE ENTERED INTO A NEW

WORLD WHERE NOTHING MATTERS AT ALL ANYMORE.

TODAY, READING FROM

A PIECE IN SLATE, JUST REAL QUICK, RUSH LIMBAUGH DESCRIBED

-- I LOVE THIS PART, DO YOU HAVE THIS?

RUSH LIMBAUGH DESCRIBED

HOW GIANFORTE WAS, QUOTE, MANLEY.

STUDLY.

THAT'S WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT.

HE TOOK DOWN A PAJAMA BOY JOURNALIST -- I DON'T EVEN KNOW

WHAT THAT MEANS -- A 125 WET DISHRAG REPORTER AND YOUR

AVERAGE MILLENNIAL MAN TODAY.

ONE COLOR TO RUSH SAID THAT IF

EVERY REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE THREW REPORTER TO THE GROUND -- WE

KNOW THEY LOVE IT -- IT WOULD INCREASE MY CHANCES

EXPONENTIALLY IN VOTING FOR THEM.

A FOX NEWS ANALYST CALLED

JACOBS A SNOWFLAKE REPORTER.

BUT THE GUY WHO LOST HIS MIND AND

COMMITTED ASSAULT, HE IS MANLY, THE OTHER GUY IS A SNOWFLAKE.

YOU COULDN'T HANDLE A QUESTION ABOUT A CBO SCORE, AND THE DAY

BEFORE THE ELECTION THE GUY IS LIKE THE CBO SCORE IS IN,

IT'S NOW OR NEVER, AND YOU DECIDED TO ASSAULT HIM, BUT

THE REPORTER IS A SNOWFLAKE.

AND KEEP IN MIND THAT THE STATEMENT ABOUT GIANFORTE BEING

STUDLY IS ALSO COMING FROM THE SAME MAN WHO CALLED SANDRA FLUKE

A SLUT BECAUSE SHE TESTIFIED IN FRONT OF CONGRESS ABOUT THE

ACCESSIBILITY OF BIRTH CONTROL.

NO, RUSH LIMBAUGH, YOU ARE A

SNOWFLAKE, YOU CAN'T EVEN HANDLE A WOMAN TESTIFYING IN FRONT OF

CONGRESS ABOUT BIRTH CONTROL SO YOU HAVE TO CALL HER A SLUT, MAN

WHO CAN'T HANDLE A QUESTION FROM A REPORTER AND GOES AHEAD AND

ASSAULTS HIM FOR ASKING THAT QUESTION, THAT GUY IS A STUD.

THE DOUBLE STANDARDS ARE RIDICULOUS THAT YOU SEE IN

CONSERVATIVE ARGUMENTS, IT DRIVES ME CRAZY.

GIANFORTE IS

NOT A STUD, HE IS A SNOWFLAKE, HE'S AN INCREDIBLE LOSER FOR NOT

BEING ABLE TO HANDLE THAT SITUATION LIKE AN ADULT.

YOU ARE

RUNNING FOR CONGRESS, TO BE A REPRESENTATIVE, AND THIS IS HOW

YOU TREAT SOMEONE FOR ASKING YOU A SIMPLE QUESTION?

HE WILL HAVE DISAGREEMENT WITH COLLEAGUES OBVIOUSLY, AND THAT'S

WHY I SAID HE WILL HAVE ISSUES ONCE HE GETS THERE.

IT'S CUTE

NOW AND HIS SUPPORTERS THINK IT'S GREAT, BUT HE WON'T BE ABLE

TO FUNCTION IN THE ENVIRONMENT HE'S GOING INTO WHERE HE'S GOING

TO HAVE TO SPEAK TO PEOPLE THAT DON'T AGREE WITH EVERYTHING HE

SAYS.

I WILL AGREE WITH YOU AT CITY WILL NEVER BE CHALLENGED, AND IN

THAT REPUBLICAN CAUCUS NO ONE WILL DISAGREE WITH HIM BECAUSE

NO ONE DISAGREES WITH ANYTHING.

UNLESS THEY ARE TO THE RIGHT OF

THE PERSON THEY ARE TALKING TO.

THERE IS NO MORE REASONABLENESS,

THE ERA OF REPUBLICANS WHO YOU COULD, AS A LIBERAL, WHO I COULD

THINK I LIKE BOB DOLE, HE'S ALL RIGHT, ALAN SIMPSON, HOWARD

BAKER, ON MOST ISSUES I DISAGREE BUT YOU KNOW THEY WERE PREPARED

TO DO THE GOVERNING BUSINESS OF THE NATION -- BOTH GUYS ARE

GONE, JIM JEFFORDS WAS THE SYMBOL OF THAT AND HE THOUGHT

THESE GUYS ARE NOT INTERESTED IN GOVERNING ANYMORE, I'M OUT --

AND IN THE HOUSE, THERE MIGHT BE A COUPLE, MAYBE IN THE SENATE

IF YOU STRETCH THE DEFINITION OF WHO THOSE GUYS ARE AND WHO THOSE

WOMEN ARE, BUT IN THE HOUSE THERE ARE NONE.

TO GIVE YOU A SENSE OF THE VOTING, IT'S IMPORTANT TO NOTE

THAT RIGHT AS THE STORY WAS BREAKING --

THIS IS REPORTING FROM WEDNESDAY NIGHT, BY THE WAY.

SO

--

THAT COULD HAVE PLAYED A ROLE AS WELL.

THAT 37% OF ELIGIBLE VOTERS -- 73% OF PEOPLE WHO ACTUALLY

VOTED.

SO THE DIE WAS CAST BEFORE.

ONE QUARTER OF THE ELECTORATE COULD BE INFLUENCED BY THAT, AND

QUIST -- WE WON'T KNOW FOR SURE -- HE DID A LITTLE BETTER ON

ELECTION DAY THAN HE MIGHT HAVE, BUT NOT ENOUGH TO OVERCOME

THE

For more infomation >> Gianforte Wins Election After Body Slamming Reporter - Duration: 13:28.

-------------------------------------------

Creamy Caldereta (Filipino Style Mutton Stew) - Duration: 3:13.

Hi guys Long Live to all of you

welcome back to our channel

my name is Mommy Shirley

today we are going to make

let's get started

the ingredients we need are

garlic

onion

tamato

green and red belt pepper

potato

carrot

and for the rest of the ingredients

please visit ius on

over low medium heat

put together the butter and cooking oil

cook garlic and onion until its become translucent

add the tomato and cook this until its soften

add the meat, soy sauce, water

and tomato sauce, simmer this for one hour

add more water if the meat is not yeat tender

then simmer this again for few minutes

add the rest of the ingredients

then simmer these until the potato & carrot become tender

and now its DONE

our Creamy Caldereta

if you like to eat this dish

please LIKE, SHARE & SUBSCRIBE to our channel

let's eat!

I made also Roast Chicken Pan

please click this link in description below

bye

For more infomation >> Creamy Caldereta (Filipino Style Mutton Stew) - Duration: 3:13.

-------------------------------------------

What Does Cruelty Free Mean ? Makeup Animal Testing | Cosmetic Testing On Animals | Be Beautethical - Duration: 6:37.

Hi guys! Welcome to Be Beautethical

I'm Archana, if you're new to my channel do

Consider subscribing. So today we are

talking about Cruelty Free Cosmetics and

Makeup. So what is cruelty-free? Since the

time I started this channel I have been

harping on cruelty free products

cruelty free makeup cruelty free skin care

cruelty free cosmetics. So what is Cruelty Free?

So there are two types of

companies. First type of company tests

either their raw materials or finished

products on animals, either they do it

directly or they get it done through a

third party. Second type of company does NOT

test on animals - be it any raw materials

or finished products - either directly or

indirectly. So I support brands which are

100% cruelty free which means neither

they test on animals nor do they employ

any third party to test on animals and

this is true for their raw materials and

the finished products as well. So what

happens in the laboratories where

these products and raw materials are

being tested on animals? These animals

are kept in horrible conditions in

laboratories, I am including a few

pictures here for you to see but I'm not

going to include any gross pictures or

any horrible pictures because I know

some of you are watching this with your

kids around and you are watching this

with your families sitting around - so please go

and check out in Google - type animal

testing when you're alone type animal

testing and check out the images and see

how horrible these animals are being

treated and kept in the laboratories just to

test a few products saying that these

are safe for humans to use and I will come

to that at a later point of time but

right now it's important for me to tell you

that these animals are tortured

deliberately and kept in horrible

conditions and ultimately they either

get killed because of the torture or

they are killed after the experiment is

done just to test these products on them

so I urge you to introspect and to think

if this is what you want to support

So coming to the effectiveness of animal

testing scientists across the world have

accepted and admitted the fact that this

is not a completely safe way of testing

products and raw materials for human

consumption because the anatomy and

physiology of human beings is completely

different from that of the animals so

the results that you get out of this

animal testing is actually not 100%

correct. So the pain, the torture and the

loss of lives that these animals are

enduring is a complete waste according

to me and is not required at all.

So are effective alternatives to animal testing

available? Yes they are available. There

are hundreds and thousands of companies

who are doing this they are using

alternative methods and they are not

only doing it in a quick and efficient

way they are also being 100%

cruelty-free. So the point is that it's

the choice of companies, it's the choice

that the company needs to make to switch

to alternative methods and to produce

their products and to make their

products in such a way that they do not

harm these innocent animals

Most countries have banned animal testing for

cosmetics so how come there are still

big brands who are getting away with

testing on animals and who do not fall

under 100% cruelty free category?

So there are two things to this - the countries

have banned animal testing for cosmetics

If a company is testing a raw material

or a product solely for cosmetic uses

then it is banned in those countries but

if that raw material or ingredient is

tested for pharmaceutical purposes and

in used in cosmetics that is not banned so

there are still companies who are doing

this they are using raw materials which

are being tested for pharmaceutical

purposes in their cosmetics preparation

And secondly unfortunately the Chinese

Government

by law requires any product that enters

the Chinese market, to be sold in the

Chinese market, they need animal testing

to be done on those products. So it is

required by law in China so if a company

wants to sell their products in China they

have to compulsorily go through animal

testing procedures, they have to invest

either do it themselves or give it to a

third party who tests on animals for

this purpose. so if any brand is selling

in China it means that it is NOT cruelty free

So the brands whose products are

available on the shelves of a retail

store or a wholesale store in China they

are absolutely not cruelty free and

fortunately for people like us who don't

want to support such brands there are a

lot of 100% cruelty free brands that are

available today who choose principles over profits

So are cruelty free brands

easily available in India? Absolutely

they are. They're available in stores

they are available online. I'm planning to

make a short video soon listing the top

makeup cruelty free brands available in

India but in the meanwhile you can go

and check out the description boxes of my

previous videos in which I always make

sure to mention all the cruelty free

products and brands that I have used

So I hope you are a little bit more

enlightened about what cruelty free

means and what it means to the animals

I personally am not able to support brands

which are insensitive towards these

animals especially after seeing the

images on the internet. I would urge you

to start your shift slowly towards

cruelty free Cosmetics and save these

animals the torture that they are going

through right now. I know you're thinking

that the switch is difficult to make but

trust me it's not as difficult as you think that it is!

Thank you so much for watching!

Do remember to subscribe to my

channel for more cruelty free videos and

for the love of the animals, don't just

make up make it cruelty free!

Have a great rest of your day and I will

see you again soon!

Bye!