Hey guys, I'm Angelo and welcome back to Crypto Coin Consultants.
Today I'll be detailing the differences between the two most popular cryptocurrency
blockchain protocols: proof-of-work & proof-of-stake.
But first, answer the following quiz question:
Which ancient currency form was the earliest example of using the proof-of-work system
to give value to a specific currency?
Shell money in the Solomon Islands, gold in ancient Persia, stone beads in ancient Tibet,
or playing cards in the French colonies of Canada.
Let us know what you think in the comments section below, and stay tuned till the end
of this video to find out the right answer!
4.
The Byzantine Generals' Problem Before I begin discussing proof-of-work, it's
important for you to be aware of the Byzantine Generals' Problem.
Imagine two generals of the Byzantine army surrounding a city they want to attack & take
over, as shown in this photo.
Each general has a group of soldiers at his command, but the two groups are separated
from one another & therefore have a difficult time communicating.
Both generals have two decisions they can choose from: attacking the city or retreating.
But here's the catch: an attack on the city would be successful ONLY IF both their armies
attack at the same time; one general retreating while the other attacks would lead to a failed
attack.
The generals can communicate with one another by sending a messenger to deliver a message,
like "We attack four days from now at midnight.
Send a messenger back to confirm."
But sending the messenger through the town to get to the other side involves a certain
risk element: the messenger can get caught & replaced with a spy, who then sends a faulty
message to the other side, like "Attack tomorrow at midnight; no need to reply!"
You can see how this would lead to a disaster.
This might sound like a bit of a sudden leap, but proof-of-work is one of the first systems
to solve this problem.
In the case of Bitcoin, for example, giving the command "I send you $100" would be
the equivalent of "Let's attack the city in two days," and you'll soon find out
why.
3.
Proof-of-work Proof-of-work is a computational protocol
miners use to validate transactions in a cryptocurrency network & add the transaction to the blockchain.
Put simply, miners use their computers to churn through a ton of different guesses until
the computer comes up with the right answer that fits within the network's required
parameters.
Now this is where things may get a little confusing, but I'll talk slow & try my best
to explain it to you in as simple of terms as possible.
Different cryptocurrencies use different mathematical formulas (or functions), all of which are
based on extremely complex cryptography.
A hash is a certain piece of information, ranging from a letter or number to even an
entire word or text file.
A hash function is a cryptography-based math equation where you input a hash value into
the equation then get an encrypted string of numbers & letters as a result (the hash).
Let me help you visualize it to make it easier.
We'll represent our hash function as h(x) = y, where h is the mathematical equation
(aka the "hash function"), x is a dynamically-changing hash value, and y is the encrypted output
(or hash).
If we wanna use the word "hello" as our hash value, the hash function would look like
h(hello), and our hash y would be an encrypted output, like 12345.
Putting it all together, we get h(hello) = 12345.
Changing our hash would give us a completely different output: h(goodbye) = 67890.
In the case of Bitcoin, the hash function that's used is known as SHA-256 (which is
an acronym for Secure Hash Algorithm, which uses a 256-bit hash).
The hash value that you input can be as many different numbers & letters as you'd like,
but the output will always be a string of 64 letters or numbers.
Changing just one letter of the hash value will yield you a completely different output.
So inputting the word "Angelo" into the SHA-256 hash function will result in a different
64-digit combination of letters & numbers than if you were to use the word "Angel"
as your hash value.
The reason why this is so secure is because SHA-256 is a one-way formula, meaning it's
impossible to reverse engineer your output to find out what the original hash value was.
So proof-of-work is essentially just that: you have a given hash function you're required
to use along with a 64-digit answer; and as a miner, you set your computer to "work"
by plugging in a bunch of different hash values in an attempt to guess the right answer.
Once you do so, you're able to validate a transaction, add it to a block, and get
rewarded for your efforts in the form of Bitcoin, which are released as block rewards.
Think of mining as simply a race to guess the right answer.
The miner who gets the right answer first gets the reward.
Going back to the Byzantine Generals' Problem, think of the 64-digit answer as an encrypted
message one of the generals is trying to send, and SHA-256 as the protocol the generals have
both agreed to use beforehand.
If the messenger gets caught in the town below, it's practically impossible to decipher
the message.
But once this message gets into the other general's hands, he can do the "work"
of guessing a ton of different message possibilities, which he'll encrypt using the SHA-256 formula.
Once his output matches the encrypted message he received, he'll know exactly what the
other general was trying to say!
There's a bunch of other aspects to proof-of-work & mining (like nonces, hash rates, and difficulty
adjustments), but my main goal of this video is to give you just a basic understanding
of these concepts so you're more informed than the average Joe.
But if you'd like to learn more about them, a quick search on Google or YouTube will yield
you a ton of different resources for you to educate yourself on these matters.
2.
Proof-of-Stake The proof-of-stake protocol differs from proof-of-work
in the sense that mining power is determined by the number of coins you hold of that particular
cryptocurrency; the more coins you hold, the more mining power you have.
Mining power with proof-of-work, on the other hand, is determined by how powerful your computer
is & how much available electricity you have at your disposal that you can direct towards
mining.
In proof-of stake, holding ownership of the coins demonstrates your "stake" in the
network.
Of course, holding more coins means you have more at stake, meaning majority holders are
entitled to more mining power; thus giving them a permanent advantage over other miners.
To remedy this, several methods have been implemented to grant smaller miners a chance
to mint the next block, such as randomized block selection & coin age based selection.
There's also the option of running a masternode, which I discussed in my previous video on
hard forks.
One of the advantages of the proof-of-stake protocol is that it solves the Tragedy of
Commons issue, which states that eventually, at some point in time, once all 21,000,000
Bitcoin have been rewarded & are in circulation, Bitcoin miners will be less motivated to mine
in the Bitcoin network since there will no longer be any block rewards at that point,
and the only way they'll only be able to earn Bitcoin is from transaction fees.
Less miners means more opportunity for an attack on the network, since it'll be easier
to control 51% of the network's computational power.
Proof-of-stake solves that by putting your own coins & investment at stake.
Even if someone manages to own 51% of the circulating supply, it'd be extremely disadvantageous
for them--and just outright stupid--to attack a network in which they hold a majority share.
Staking their coins as collateral incentivizes them to maintain the network's overall integrity
& well-being.
1.
Which is better?
Both protocols have their own advantages & disadvantages.
Proof-of-work allows for not just miners, but also developers & the coin's community
members to vote on potential changes to be implemented into the network.
But on the flipside, proof-of-work requires exorbitant amounts of electricity to run mining
rigs.
As of 2017, the Bitcoin mining network used more electricity in a year than all of Ireland
as a whole.
Each Bitcoin transaction uses an average of 300 kilowatt hours of electricity, which is
enough to bring 36,000 kettles full of water to a boil.
Proof-of-stake, on the other hand, is said to be more energy-efficient than proof-of-work,
while at the same time more secure.
But its biggest disadvantage is that the miners (or stakeholders) are the ones who hold all
the power.
Unlike in proof-of-work, miners able to theoretically implement whatever changes they so choose
without having to get approval from developers or community members.
This contradicts the coin's supposed "decentralized nature" by potentially putting all the voting
power & control in the hands of a centralized few.
So which ancient currency form was the earliest example of using the proof-of-work system
to give value to a specific currency?
If you guessed shell money in the Solomon Islands, you're right.
The value of the shell money was determined by the time spent creating them, which were
made by working the shells into strips of decorated cloth.
Experts find a striking resemblance between this & Bitcoin's proof-of-work protocol,
yet shell money was developed between 10,000 to 30,000 years earlier!
For more infomation >> Do You Know Da Wae - Duration: 0:13. 
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét