Okay, let's get this
  the show started here. So this leads  to be very interactive
  I'm not gonna stand behind the podium  and
  I want you to stop me and ask questions  we're gonna pass stuff around
  And if we get to that we might even do a  chemistry reaction
  try to make it is as fun for you guys as  it is for me
  I love to give these kinds of talks because
  first of all, if I make a technical mistake  you're less likely to see it
  and it's a lot of fun to get to talk  to people about the work that we do
  and get some
  fresh input and feedback from people  that I don't work with all the time
  I will say one thing working at NIST,  people leave feet first.
  We have a tremendous tenure. If you stay
  more than five years at NIST, eighty  percent of those people retire from NIST.
  So clearly, there's people walking  around 90,
  95 years old, still coming into work  every day. Actually one guy got
  his eighty-year pin.
  Eighty years. Okay, so first of all I  have to say this cause if this
  gets out to the public, I have to say that  at say that I'm not endorsing anybody.
  Anything I say is not the official  opinion at the Department of Commerce or
  the National Institute of Standards and Technology. It's strictly me telling you my
  professional opinion.
  And any commercial things that I mention  I'm not saying they're better or worse
  or good or bad or
  they're just aren't telling you what they  are.
  get my clickers I don't have to go back  and forth okay so for those of you that
  don't know about missed
  om about a nice little place where
  all geese are strong all that you're  good-looking
  Anna all the scientists are above  average I am
  I wrote this talk on a Sunday listening  to NPR's on so we have our first Nobel
  Prizes by Bill Phillips
  on 1997 on 2001
  got another Nobel Prize to eric cornell  I'll
  then we had John Hall in 2005 and then  finding that day
  Winland just a couple years ago these  guys all work in a
  optical trapping so they shine lasers  through things and
  make adams' Ste stay really really still  which make them really really cold
  so they make the call the stuff in the  universe some the temperatures they're
  able to reach her you know submental  calvin's
  so that the billion degree above  absolute zero yes
  actually each one of them the first time  I met
  met Bill Phillips I didn't know he was  the inner hey white
  the bill I bill and why it and then he's  I was at a seminar in and started asking
  all these really intelligent questions  as I
  guys really sharp and so than after the  talk
  I where they're nice eyes bad I was like  up that bill
  think but no pretense
  you know just normal guy I'll
  so we say that this is our half Nobel  laureate because I
  he's not in this staff person but the  research that he did
  that got him the Nobel Prize he did at  NIST he's an Israeli citizen and
  missed cannot hire non US citizens he  was here on a sabbatical in
  return the University tel aviv and then  we have a
  John Kane got the Kyoto prize which is  like the Nobel Prize in material science
  so very prestigious prize I'm so this  just a few examples a
  the like big names you can find NIST so  I'm gonna do a little
  personal anecdotal vignette about
  what has happened in four generations so  from my grandfather
  to my father to me I don't have any kids  sole use by
  nephews as sir that om
  so much for my brother grandfather's  born in 1925
  and a the calculators that they had were  these
  its common at E eight er and it was  actually used
  primarily to calculate financial  transactions and England
  back when they're on the pound sterling  pants this crazy
  them I don't even know how they
  calculate the prices be way this was a  given that do it is kinda cool
  in that com one side you do addition
  and then you could turn it over on the  other side you could do subtraction
  so it's almost kinda like you know these  iPhone
  term one way the other way different  functionalities so kinda cool
  and then this one was a the kurta art
  kinda looks like a paper mill I'm so you  would slide in your numbers and then you
  would crank it in this mechanical  apparatus with spit out a number
  arm in so in you could buy that in 1948  after
  after world war two had finished up and  in today's dollars it was 250 bucks
  so not not a cheap think now you get a  calculator for
  free om see
  okay so my dad was born in 1951 arm
  and he's you slide rule
  was in schools in the nineties a slide  rule I don't
  up but maybe I should
  arm and so when he graduated from  college my grandparents about him
  this calculator a in today's dollars  about 150 bucks
  not terribly expensive but not terribly  cheap either I
  and I remember run on a nine volt  battery
  plug it into the wall and I I would play  with it when I was a kid
  and get scolded because it was like  pride and joy
  arm now so I was born in 1975
  I've never used in chemical calculator  I'd would know what the hell to do with
  a slide rule
  om and when I was in high school I used  a TI 85 so this is one of these first
  graphing calculators
  and so then if we go to Mike
  nephews born in 1996 a
  he doesn't think he thinks things that  have buttons
  are weird so he's not used to anything a  keyboard okay
  but even that he prefers to type on an  iPad than an actual keep
  or like that but some have a touchscreen  arm
  and so anybody have kids around that age
  do you know what they call the whole
  phone phones in hand-held phones
  it's ok it's maybe a little bit non-pc
  arm so they call phones with buttons are
  how much phones up
  um actually my boss has an Amish phone
  any teases me cuz is cuz he's like you  have to trade your iPhone every day
  I can charge my phone once a week as I
  well you know you can only make phone  calls with you years I can do anything
  with mine is like it's not them is a  shin problem
  do you want battery life for you our  performance
  om okay so
  I'm gonna draw apparel I'm gonna try to  tell the story
  about how electronics developed I
  over the since you know the past 50  years or so
  because it's really pretty phenomenal  what we can do now compared to what we
  could do
  I when my grandfather was my age
  om and so the in 1965
  the cofounder Intel Corporation word  more
  still around proposed what is known as a
  Moore's Law and that is every two years  the computing power available
  doubles om and so if we look at a at a  chart
  love the development computing power as  a function
  my pointer here
  com being we can see back here in  nineteen hundred we had these the
  mechanical coupling calculators that  were able to do
  you know us calculation every five or  six seconds
  and then as we move up now the the  processes that are currently available
  they were able to do
  ramp in the 11 calculations per second  and so we're actually getting close to
  computers now that have the same at  least in theory
  computational capability now arm and  then
  he'll hook is on a log scale here on
  we get here we're looking at the human  brain now
  p.m. 1 comment about Moore's Law there's  debate
  on how long continue because right now  most processors
  are fabricated on what's called the 21  enemy to process
  so that means it's able to make features  that are 21 many meters
  so that's you took a meter
  which is about a yard you cut it up into  a billion pieces
  YouTube 21 those really really really  tiny
  and the issue now is the very very
  limited by the purity
  what you're making because if you think  about it 21 animators you're looking at
  a few hundred Adams so if you get one  Adam that's not the right
  Adam in there it a big effect on your  system so
  while will be able to make things things
  smaller it's going to become much much  more expensive so they think we may be
  plateauing
  now that doesn't mean that Moore's Law  School point stop necessarily
  what we need is some new
  algorithm for computing some new  platforms a rather than using
  transistors using
  up quantum
  computing optical computing on this is  what a lot of the
  nobel laureates focus on is trapped in  these items so that they get into
  particular quantum state that they can  control and so rather than operating
  with binary transistors either on or off
  you can have up to eight different  quantum state so that computing power
  geometrically
  com okay so that this is this is a fun  flight
  fun cells lights up so I checked on  Amazon the other day
  and leave here to 128 gig flash drive I
  for 14 bucks and
  just so you guys can look at like this  is one of these kinda disassembled
  you can see that the chip ears on this  side pass that around
  on that was not a 128 gig that's
  otherwise I wouldn't give it to you om  doing it that for
  1390 40 bucks om
  which is incredible but if we wanted to  build something like this in nineteen
  forty
  use in nineteen forties star om
  we need 1.1 trillion vacuum tubes
  and so what is it even wanna back into  this okay so these things
  are still in use and from the folks at  NIS that our analog guys still talk
  about how
  digital electronics are crap and that  the vacuum tubes are still the best way
  to go for letting so it looks kinda like  a light bulb
  and basically it does functionally the  same thing as a transistor but it takes
  a lot more power
  om it doesn't switch not able to switch  States
  as quickly om in his big big
  I'm so we can pass that around look at
  they're not all that big a more typical  sizes like
  you know maybe like that or so but this  one is nice because you can see all the
  innards
  parts okay so we would need
  thats by the way that about 150 vacuum  tubes
  for each person recognized
  face
  that means a
  basically population the world by by  just put it in perspective
  up we need tuna a thousand square miles
  which is roughly about the side the  state of Delaware we did 4.7 trillion
  dollars
  to power I'll these vacuum tubes thats
  using the price in just inflation  adjusted to the price vacuum tube in
  nineteen forties inflation-adjusted now  om
  which is roughly the US military budget  for six years at least that's what
  on the records I know some people talk  about whether or not that's
  accurate
  we need 76.8 gigawatts of power
  and put that in perspective arm that's  about
  the power consumption country of Germany  so
  it would never happen but just to put  that
  in a little bit more perspective I we  could fit
  the state of Delaware and Jolly Rancher
  about how big that om
  we had fun the US military for six years  for the price of a bucket of chicken
  om and power the country in Germany with
  about three AA batteries so
  that is a really really mindboggling  shift
  and that's why these things would be  completely unfathomable
  somebody in the nineteen forties okay  some
  let me jump out of the clouds now  because thats not an entirely fair
  comparison
  but at least mathematically it's legit  so what caused this
  it was a a series of disruptive  technologies
  so somebody was doing something with  pulleys and levers
  to do mathematical calculations and they  moved along
  belong to move along and somebody said I  got a new idea
  and totally changed the game and what
  were able to do so
  before 1940 the only switches we have  were mechanical relays
  basically this is an electromagnet you  apply power to the electromagnet
  move the peace the middle to one side  and close the switch
  you turn off the electromagnet the peace  medal moves away from them
  other peace medal in opens the switch um
  their big they generate a lot of heat  arm
  they have moving parts moving parts are  bad om
  a lot of electricity they switch slowly
  you get energized that magnet in the end  physically moved the lever over
  and then when you turn it off you have  to de-energized the magnet
  and then have a spring that pushes it  back over um
  short half-life could you get a moving  part eventually that movie part wears
  out
  as it slammed up against the other part
  many times on its really difficult to  integrate with other parts
  so the first a disruptive technology
  we had was back into which is going  around here
  so we got rid of the the moving parts
  and we because there's no moving parts  as a much longer life much lower failure
  rate
  and actually there's these back into
  in the nineteen forties that are still  chugging along om
  and mother wanna actually the guy the  game back into
  back into the fishing out was telling me  and I don't know if this is true
  on that because if their pristine switch  inability
  that on nuclear subs they still use
  vacuum tubes to verify
  QR codes to come in to verify the lot  authorize a launch
  I don't know if it's true been on an
  name the celeb it's probably classified  anyway om
  so in the nineteen seventies
  a we started to
  we invented the trend well in 1953 Bell  Laboratories and into the transistor in
  about nineteen sixty became something  the
  commercially by and we started to get
  om integrated circuits and so now we've  Jenner
  we removed no longer a big things  actually
  small let me pass one around actually on
  my the box
  this is an old AMD chip
  I don't remember it's an apple on
  when I bought it was probably you know  state-of-the-art now it's worth
  nothing I'll let me just point out so  this little silver part you see here
  that's the that's actually the
  the meat the computer part it's about  the size of a thumbnail
  and then on the other side we have all  these pens allow the electronics to go
  into now
  so the actual chip itself as the small  thing all those others
  just interfaces the microscopic world  arm
  so if we if we if we make a parallel and  we say a computer
  that existed on in the night
  like around the time the eniac so in the  nineteen fifties or so we said that
  its speed was equivalent to them how  fast a snail could move on today's
  computers
  would operate at a speed that roughly  quarter-million
  times faster in the spatial upon reentry  into her
  and I didn't do the exact calculation  but that might actually be violating
  I'm standing in speed of light I think  but
  will forgo that on
  okay now I wanna say down to because on
  if I break it will kill me
  I'm EU's chemistry and biology  interchangeably now om
  you know there's an kind of a joke going  around at one point it said
  when I started college I learned that  physics was math chemistry with physics
  and biology was chemistry com
  mmm sunny use these things can be  interchangeable E
  especially because we're operating at  the interface
  read at the junction between what one  would traditionally called biology
  and one which traditionally call  chemistry com
  so here on the left is a picture
  chemistry lab at Harvard in 1902 and  then on the right is a
  chemistry lab at the University of South  Carolina in 2006
  if you hadn't looked in my lab in 2014
  it would look roughly the same is this  in that
  we've got dude standing around beakers  in test tubes mixing things
  in 2006 we still have we've got one big  change
  we now have a dude and a girl om
  actually where I work at this now we're  more
  more female than male is about 55  percent female
  45 percent male om back in the seventies  we have a picture
  other auditorium at NIST somebody giving  a talk and it said a
  missed Diversity Committee sign in to  see
  it's about 200 people all in black suits  with a black tie
  and then one guy white blazer not a girl  to be seen
  com hennen even its
  this is unpalatable in today's world
  but om in this is kinda the more that I  liked propagate
  in the sixties
  fifties and sixties there actually was  and miss
  in BS contest and so there was Miss
  physics and miss chemistry and
  this electronics and I don't know and  they actually have like
  fascism beauty contests and just
  I can't even fathom having even
  that can even be bada in today's world  but
  in anyway still operating in the same  paradigm we haven't had this big shift
  from you know being able to fit
  basically all these books in this  library on a little devices by the
  grocery store
  arm so what can we learn here
  is have to merge into the stalking
  wondered if I'm on the right one I'll  you
  so Electronix are nothing more than the  interactions of electrons with various
  components
  and then computers are basically
  sophisticated machines that allow the  controller
  where electrons are movin and how fast  they're movin and how many of them are
  moving in which directions there moving
  and that allows us to do some really  amazing results to process
  information
  so chemistry really is just nothing more  than the interaction
  different molecules with each other okay  so we control where molecules move
  if they're allowed to mix or we separate  them or
  we get them ha cold these different  things
  om so can we make something analogous to  this
  that would produce sophisticated machine  that allows to learn about chemistry and
  biology
  or also this will be the last little bit  actually use these machines
  to do chemistry to make things okay
  so I realize this is a broad audience
  so this is gonna be maybe a little bit  elementary to some folks and maybe two
  other folks
  it'll be a reminder
  high school biology classes I'm so DNA  is the blueprint
  %uh life 0 sorry back a say one thing
  I'm gonna draw a parallel how DNA  sequencing technologies developed
  from when I was born in 1975 until
  today and just how much has changed
  in those almost four years forty years  yet for years
  com
  okay so DNA is the blueprint applied  informational molecule it's what
  make me not have hair and
  that back there before haired me
  arm in its up
  it's made out of four letters mainly  there's there's
  a courses exceptions and modifications  but we have
  a the first one is at meaner with  related a
  the structures will be on the quiz later  I had to memorize them when I was in
  undergrads you know there the other one  is tiny
  related with T a then we have one
  abbreviated G and then we have a cited  seen
  abbreviated with see and what
  should jump out at you is that the  yellow and the blue
  kinda looks similar right and the pink
  in the green kinda looks similar similar  shape
  common that's because these two like to  get together
  and needs to like to get together and  that allows us to create double-stranded
  DNA
  that a little bit
  detailed om okay so the order these  letters in the DNA
  are the instructions so AAA GGG read
  GA are two different things so
  I could take a some English letters and  say
  tie your shoes I can take those same  letters and rearrange them
  and say rally hoist same letters
  different order completely different  meaning arm
  the same thing with DNA you got those  four letters but the order
  those is exactly critical to what the  molecules able to do
  by the way this was probably the hardest  part
  making this of finding something that  actually made sense but wasn't
  on
  lot a four-letter words were able to  come okay
  so let's look at DNA sequencing
  and how did this all get started arm  first demonstrated in 1975 by gaining
  Frederick Sanger at the University of  Cambridge in England
  I'm he sequence
  gmail by X 174 I X 17
  next that it's a virus that attacks  E-coli
  pretty simple virus and
  its its genome is 5400
  bases are letters long arm
  and so in 1980 he got the nobel prize  but was a sec
  Nobel Prize his first one in like  nineteen fifty-seven when the few people
  that has
  to Nobel Prizes so what he demonstrated  in 1975 was a very laborious
  difficult time-consuming
  technique in 1977 there were two  different methods that were developed
  and up until about two thousand and 5  ever so
  they were the though biggest workforce  technology they're used
  in labs when I was in grad school and  when I was a postdoc even om
  him so walter gilbert who is a professor  at Harvard
  up published his method in the preceding  the National Academies of Science
  in February 1977 and then
  Frederick Sanger published and updated  method on
  in December 1977 so you know you like
  in the scientific world in you you  publish a paper just
  a few months after somebody published a  similar paper and they're both really
  good we call it getting scooped
  and it really really sucks as you can  imagine these guys were
  three or four years on this project and  somebody beat you to the finish line
  actually here is not the word
  is
  but they both got the nobel prize in  nineteen eighties so Frederick Sanger
  passed away
  about a year ago walter gilbert running  around okay
  so I'm gonna try to explain in simple  we're gonna sequence a PC DNA
  very short pieces DNA again trying to  come up with the word with only four
  letters
  said Gaga gagged her princes Lady Gaga
  make it you guys really meat dress
  crazy girl
  okay p.m. in what we're gonna do is  we're gonna make a bunch of copies
  that remix four sets of copies oneself  cop
  one copy set is only get consist
  a pieces that in day so we have GA GA GA
  you did on the really create another set
  only ins and tease we basically
  read out the pieces DNA to reality and  then we stop
  and we do the same thing for the Seas  and again the same thing for the G's
  now arm
  what we're gonna do next is really do a  technique called
  elector freezes pictures I'm
  may be easier and so what that allows us  to do is measure the link that the
  molecule
  and so if we can separate and find out  which molecules are short
  and longer which one is one base long  two bases long
  three bases long bases long and we know  what the end is we can read out that
  letter
  so we put that in there we apply  electric field in long pieces in DNA
  move really really slow
  short is DNA moved past and so
  if we if you put it in the electric  field
  yes sorry elector freezes so what we do  use DNA
  negatively charged at the polly an eye  on so
  p.m. negatively charged if we apply a  positive field here
  and negative charge here and we start  the DNA me a little but its
  will start to move in this direction and
  the smaller they are the faster they go  these
  the median that there and it's called
  a gel and it's basically looks like  jello
  our rooms or poly acrylic my
  there's a broader eleven different  chemistry but if I were to pass it
  around I can't pass it around because a  lot of its toxic
  om but it would look
  feel like jello really stiff jail
  like the kinda jealous you need to make  George dating
  the alcohol doesn't let the jello  Chelsea are
  anyway we had the G's here
  and then we apply the electric field in  a movie and based on the size
  we know where they are and we can see  that each one is in a different place
  so evil apply the electric field for a  certain amount of time
  until they've all separated so this one  hears
  the biggest piece in DNA and it's in  there an RT pop
  the letter T not like HD om
  so we know that insanity and then our  next shortest one
  is in our a pocket so you know the ins  and a the number three is a C
  notin see I number Four's again from our
  a pop so we know that that molecule in  the day and we keep going keep going
  through this om and what we finally see
  is that we get Gaga gagged
  a cat so it backwards revelry doubt that  sequence
  arm
  okay so in the mid eighties this was  done in
  a technique called slab gels was a  something up
  get a picture
  must've been really happy image
  yeah okay so here's a picture of it it
  it's something about the size of a big  sheet cake om
  you and so you you load your DNA
  up here in your ply the electric field  in the inning
  arm so here's our
  challenge list here's its low use  radioactive label
  we don't like reactivity arm you have to  pour these gels by hand so you
  you graduate students that makes up the  polymer
  in a liquid they poured out into the  cake pan they let it sit
  AP lit up and they put it into another  device the load in their DNA samples
  they apply the electric field they go  home in a sleeper for hours
  then they come back into the lab and  they look at the jail in the
  read out the jail just like I did for  you accept these children are really big
  and so that's the life of a graduate  student
  back in the mid-seventies if you're  working in DNA sequencing
  I so in about 1980 guy named Leroy hood
  and is registered in
  wordsmith in into the technology that  allowed you to do automated DNA
  sequencing
  so now you can load up your gel look at  your DNA
  go home and sleep for eight hours and  then come back in and get a printout
  what your DNA sequences and then you re  om
  its flow still very slow but we've got  rid of the radioactive labels
  and the manual preparation and data  readout
  big step forward com
  so in the nineteen actually did my PhD
  on capillary electrophoresis I'm so
  in the mid nineteen nineties they  started doing these things in
  capillaries
  and so a capillary is nothing more than  a really really really skinny to
  and so if you can see
  arm this right here is the capillary  barely visible in this picture
  and its taped onto this white plastic  piece
  with electrical tape ordinary electrical  tape action they were
  also using something akin to chewing  them at one point on
  or that sticky stuff used to stick  posters on the wall
  tacky stuff this is an actual capillary  that we
  you could use to do DNA electrophoresis  I'll just pass that around
  you get the feeling that the outside  diameters 360 microns which is about
  diameter two or three hairs human hairs
  in Yuma secure areas the inner diameters  about 50 microns
  on so that's five won millions
  me and you can't see it
  in his taped up because ok you you  actually cut yourself
  pastor
  om
  so it's relatively slow but not as slow
  get rid of this requirement to use a lot  of chemistry because
  are sorry a large amount stuff cuz  instead of pouring out a cake pan
  full of stuff you feeling this EB EB BB  BD 2
  with Stussy just need maybe a  teaspoonful materials around
  from rather than leaders have material  to run once
  but the problem is that those
  silica capillaries it's made out a  quartz actually
  com are very sensitive to fouling
  and so if you start to get junk on the  inside that too
  you no longer able to the separation so  the in
  and the other thing is you notice that  that one capillary
  so you can only do one sample at a time
  with that slab gel you could have many  different samples
  so I liken it to the capillary  electrophoretic the capillary version is
  like a Ferrari
  will go really really fast but it's  going to break down all the time in its
  own we'll carry two people
  whereas the slab gels are kinda slow
  I'm clocking but they work is like an  18-wheeler
  you can load it up with a buncha stuff  it's only gonna go sixty-five seventy
  five miles an hour
  but it can bring a lot of stuff with yep
  Schur please
  well as able to process a lot of samples  appease the DNA
  different beanie okay sorry
  okay a so I'll
  when we do DNA sequencing analysis we  need to separate
  a lot of different DNA samples okay
  in the more those that were able to  separate the more information really get
  so I can separate one sample really fast
  or I can separate 32 different samples
  really slow but in the end I'm producing  the same amount of data per time
  okay whatever you want to look at
  okay so if we read out
  the DNA code we can sequence the genome  I
  we can tell what kinda phenotype what  kind of characteristics that organism
  so base you can predict I color hair  color
  skin color propensity for certain  disease types
  a lot of stuff
  set sacred okay
  cool okay so then
  when I was in grad school up people  started doing the things in
  and ninety-six capillary arrays and you  know why they chose 96
  I cannot member people like to take like  10
  101,000 official
  that's a good answer pre-budget
  om so everybody does their
  analysis and what's called a 96-well  plate so that means that we're doing
  ninety six different pieces of DNA
  in a in a standard form factor
  and so what that a lot so people in  their work in
  units 96 you can do you got a sample  tray with 96 samples and you do 96
  capillaries
  you're off to the races arm this is  actually a
  is an instrument that I had in grad  school are called a
  Megabass because was able to produce  1,000,000 bases
  have DNA informations was able to read  out 1,000,000 letters at the DNA code
  in one day and we thought we were
  that word
  arm been and
  this guy cost about two hundred fifty  thousand dollars back then
  you can see the ninety-six capillaries  that are dip down into this 96-well
  plate with the DNA is
  there's an electric field apply the name
  all ninety six different pieces DNA  moved through that capillary there's an
  optical scanner here that the text them
  and then ago here in two ways okay
  so it still slow but we've gotten rid of  the little took
  cat sample capacities were able to look  at 96 his Indian a rather than just one
  are but it's still finicky because now  you have ninety-six capillaries all in
  one unit
  one goes bad then you get ninety five  pieces
  DNA to go bad 94 and eventually at some  point you say well
  times what about the arrays that makes  the company really happy because they
  can sell you these things that
  crazy price makes you really sad because  you've spent a lot of money
  an you have to swap it out do a whole  bunch of in
  realignment and recalibration  readjustment the instrument
  but these were the instruments that did  the the initial human genome project
  so up in Rockville there was a company  called elaire
  they had hundreds these things running  24/7
  arm and then there was Tiger which was  the
  Institute for genomic research which is  the government effort
  they had thousands at these things as  well p.m.
  Applied Biosystems and molecular  dynamics for the two companies that made
  these instruments
  they mail money and they're actually  with
  in cahoots with other people as well  okay to the human genome project started
  in about nineteen
  ninety and it was an initiative
  a put forward by president clinton
  to sequence the human genome in its  entirety
  so the human genome is about 3 billion  base is long om
  and we wanted to find nobody had done it  before so we didn't know what the
  library of the human
  cold was and so there was a huge  initiative the cost
  about $13 billion dollar took well over  10 years
  on to read out all those three billion  bases they sequenced
  the genome a single female I
  don't know name is Don that one lucky  person was the first person to get there
  genome sequenced and it cost us like I  said 13
  billion with be dollars I'll
  so in the nineteen nineties in this is  what I did my research on is
  that we started to move these into  microfluidic devices
  some gonna pass a couple things around  don't give these back to me because
  we're gonna do a demo in a little while
  and I want you to have at least one you  can look at with your neighbor
  and I'll explain what these things are
  might have to share more you guys don't  need to see a
  unity is
  work in my lap they work in our lives
  okay so if you can kinda read your  finger on their you can feel some like
  group the
  on one side unless it's a sealed ships  might be sealed
  the sealed ones you can kinda feel those
  group those groups are actually a the  tubes
  so what we've done is we rather than  make
  using one of those glass capillary tubes  we've actually made it to
  are in this device now what is that  gains
  there's one big change we go from  one-dimensional system
  were the only thing we can control is  the link that the two
  to a two-dimensional system so now we  can make things that go
  this direction in this direction  restrictions now we can start playing
  games
  about rather than just movin a DNA  molecule
  in one direction we can start to show  that around different directions
  and that allows us to start to do a lot  of cool stuff and so we started doing
  a started doing DNA sequencing
  in these devices om it was
  it solved all the problems except it was  damned expensive
  really expensive om because
  this old guy here this is a silicon one  not the plastic
  guess how much is gas to make
  we used use the same techniques that you  use to make a microchip
  so when they make a microchip they  fabricated on a wafer thats
  a certain diameter and then they cut it  up into a million pieces
  because they make a million chips on  that and the package a month so
  when you fabricate and lets a 12-inch  wafer
  and then you cut it up into I don't know  how many chips 12-inch wafer but you're
  able to
  amortize the cost that chip over all  those devices and so you can sell a chip
  for a couple a box rather than that so  this
  actually costs about ten thousand  dollars to make old
  don't drop it no attorney broken
  I'm that's how to use it as a demo and  another one
  yes so
  are so this one's made at uva
  material called silicon om
  it's this material that computer chips  are primarily made out of
  on these in order to get around this ten  thousand dollar cost we tried to start
  making them in plastic so that they were  cheap
  is plastic cheap this were
  you once led her to me I think know you  are
  okay so this is actually
  aversion a the chip that passing around
  under a microscope okay and so remember  said we were able to start
  now that we have a two-dimensional  system we can start to move DNA in
  different directions because we can make  it
  intersection tery your whatever you can  dream up
  so get it shipped out so if you look  great here
  and who I forgot ship
  so
  don't no pride no shame I have to use  these
  so this is just a jeweler's loupe so you  can look up
  maybe make it a little easier to see  they're coming back
  arm
  actually I was I was with
  a in the lab the other day and we were  looking at a computer screen
  get data and I didn't have my glasses on  and I was
  and I had to finally zoom the screen and  my boss is standing back behind me
  and he started make a comment about my  eyes
  starting to like shot quite om so that's  why
  jewelers anyway argument
  or any so we apply a voltage
  sorry we loaded the United the DNA in  this case is labeled green
  okay and so there's a mixture of DNA in  here and we're gonna separate that DNA
  we apply a voltage in this direction
  so if you look at one edge have the  device over here you can kinda see a
  a little cross where the where the holes  or there's a pension
  like 16 holes there we're only looking  at but when we look at one of those
  lines
  not all you love them so we apply this  voltage from north to south and then at
  a certain time we're going to switch
  and we're gonna play the voltage from
  weft East and so what's gonna happen is  that the DNA that caught
  in this little intersection here is  gonna start to move
  down this direction and so
  just so you know a typical DNA  sequencing run takes about an hour
  to do with the traditional techniques  that we've been talking about before
  and I'll show you how long it takes to  do with this
  in ago
  good so we switched the voltage right  about there
  and you can see the DNA moving down  there
  and here in just a little bit you start  to see the different pieces
  DNA appear you get these bands third
  simply
  dard is under a microscope so and and  it's a fluorescence microscope and so
  lots of things for us dirt is one of  those ominous impossible to keep these
  things
  perfectly clean there's techniques for
  getting around that but this has been  done in a microscope
  actually when I was doing this work
  we have the world speed record for DNA  sequencing I'll
  had it for like three months he yet
  yeah I am suspended upper slowdown it  some
  because the way the microscope operates
  arm that's where you get this kinda I'll
  holes
  yeah frame rates I thank you brain  freeze yeah that's because it's taking a
  picture
  every couple seconds cuz the way it  works it takes a while to scan the whole
  image
  okay so missus have a fun place so I had  given this
  talk added internal division meeting
  and a when these guys he started working  at NIST in 1950
  ominous would've been in 2002 guys been  around for a while
  arm name is wolfgang heller
  from Austria most famous for creating  controlled pore glass
  cool om
  side presented this in this older  gentleman at that point I didn't know
  him
  your process and he said and I'm gonna  paraphrase I'm really glad
  you guys are starting to work on this  stuff again a
  and then he showed me a
  this which was at back in nineteen  fifties
  when he just started working in this was  a top-secret
  gizmo a pass around be a little bit  delicate with this because
  it is kinda special to me anyway arm
  so what is this gizmo
  NIST back then was called National  Bureau of Standards
  om and it how's the diamond ordinance
  laboratory burdine sorry diamond  ordinance
  fuse laboratory so what if used the its
  the I what's a good device that was  credited with winning world war two
  next to the a bomb and so what it is
  is it controls when a bomb explodes used  to just drop a bomb and when it hit
  something up
  then they started putting in these  devices that would tell it to blow up
  when it reached a certain altitude
  or certain velocity or a certain
  whatever parameter you wanted to set com  they only use them
  over water never used them on Lancaster  word
  one would fail in the germans find it  reverse engineer secrets
  I and it moved to the Army in 1952
  so here's a picture that guy and so what  is it
  it's actually and analog pneumatic
  computer to control the detonation of a  bomb a
  in the case of a nuclear attack so you  not familiar with
  if the nuclear bomb goes off you get an  electromagnetic pulse
  an all-electronic go crazy so this was a  backup device
  so with than if the russians new us week  in New
  back om without the effect that the
  that kinda that's why it's fun to work  at NIST is because you know you show
  this
  that he really really proud of and some  old guy comes and says
  we're doing that when your dad was a kid
  okay so here's where we are in the first  30 years in DNA sequencing
  I 1975 to to sequence 5,000 bases
  took more than a year took a world-class  you know
  Nobel laureate research lab in england
  and god knows how much money it cost  because
  calculate that I'm and then in 2005  using that Megabass we get sequence
  a million bases in one day with one  technician
  for about a thousand dollars so if we  take this snail speed analogy now
  sequencing in 1975 moved at a snail's  pace
  in 2005 we're movin at about two times  the speed to the camp Concord
  this is really really good
  but it's also really not good because  we're doing the same
  ru still doing the basic same thing
  but Indian an electric field moving it  in separating
  by pieces there hasn't been a  fundamental change we have gone from a
  vacuum to
  to integrate circuit or from a  mechanical
  computing device back into there hasn't  been a big while
  in till that 2005
  so I would say that DNA sequencing
  just went through something they can to  the introduction of the integrated
  circuit
  in 1970 in talking about for sir
  so we look at this chart this is the log  chart the cost
  it takes to produce Megabass if DNA  sequencing
  on here's a pseudo Moore's Law so that  means that every two years ago its
  price cuts in half and we see that from  2001 to 2005
  when we were building these capillaries  microchip a systems we were decreasing
  the cost
  pre/post Moore's Law and then something  happens right around here
  what happened pretzels and
  drops down to nothing om there was a new  disruptive technology that came around
  and it was the ability to
  rather than taking a big group of DNA  molecules
  in separating them we were able to take  a single molecule DNA
  interrogated take one molecule DNA
  and read its bases 123 456 789 10
  that's kinda cool but we were able to do  that
  take a million pieces a DNA or tens of  millions of pieces
  DNA and then read each one of their  sequence simultaneously
  sore reading each individual piece of  DNA a million times a million pieces
  DNA individually at the same time  phenomenal
  why are we able to do that how are able  to do that I
  I would say that's because we're  starting to blur did lines between the
  biologists in the chemists
  in the physicists in the material  scientists in the computer scientists
  a twenty years ago a biologist in a  chemist
  different languages just like I'm using  a different language I'm trying to do my
  best
  problems in some language little  confusing om
  so now arm we can sequence
  so we go back to the 1975 analogy and  say that's a snail's pace
  right now we can produce 3 billion
  faces a DNA information in one day with  one technician
  for 1000 bucks 3 billion base is a DNA  is the human genome so
  in theory in theory
  it's not exactly doable in theory
  do that for 1000 bucks today so now ur  four times special
  every entry not a quarter million times  for now
  or four times com but you know
  five years ago in iPhones every  runaround blackberry
  look
  had no no these are great questions
  please ask these questions um
  so here's a picture
  wanted these actual devices arm I could  not get a copy of the video
  because it's blockbuster
  are there's the functional device
  so we go back re:
  so here's the actual instrument so it's  it's notes like EA buy you a
  these folks actually use the inkjet  printer model they say the instrument
  for free
  or almost free but then that the kid you  have to use to do they charge at the was
  for om won the wasn't
  I this one is called an alumina
  there's about five different vendors  that make them
  and they all operate on the same  procedure reading out
  each based on a single piece of DNA and  in doing that on a million pieces
  millions pieces a day but the  interrogated differently
  on them to electronically optically said
  enzymatically lot of different ways com
  so here's the gizmo the actual device
  this is a standard pins you get an idea  scale
  and what happens is you too high
  a buncha pieces of DNA under the surface  and
  you take a million copies I'm not gonna  go into details
  do it but you basically take a million  copies a single piece of DNA
  and you put that in one spot and then  you take a million copies of another
  piece of DNA
  saying the city in a bit then another  spot and then you do
  you take an enzyme that breeds of the  DNA bases and each time it sees a
  different DNA bases flashes a different  color
  so you know when you see a pink flash  there was any
  you see a purple flash there was a T  whatever
  and you put a camera on their in what  you get
  it looks like static on a old TV screen  an old-fashioned
  calls for two different colors flashing  all over the place that's what it looks
  like
  each one of those pixels as that color  changes is telling you what the
  sequences on that particular DNA
  you can log all that data you feed it  into a huge computer
  and resemble like the world's biggest  chip
  really pretty cool
  so here's where with them to this phone
  this is actually work its and services  you know about that day
  and you get go and thats
  come back in a couple hours you get your
  billions bases in DNA information  unpalatable
  when I was in grad school we were  working on this and we would get where
  we could make
  thousand bases in a couple hours were  really rock
  and in so many publishers a paper we  like
  I'm done this technology is
  at it and I've been vacuum tube has been  replaced
  the integrated circuit okay so now this  is gonna be maybe a little bit more
  different more fun maybe so can we use  chemistry To make stuff
  use these new chemistry is to make  things on
  should and so wanna talk about now is  something called a liposome
  an Olympic was nothing more than an  artificial
  cell its basically
  ok a little man ok container will  small-scale container
  I made outta
  up lipitor see they're like
  advertised in alpha hydroxy
  therapy in skin creams in this kinda  stuff that basic sing and stuff but
  what's cool about it
  is it's a tiny tiny container and  whatever's on the inside
  can't get out waters on the outside  getting into you
  change something so you can open and  close them
  permeate them but in general these days
  okay so the current state-of-the-art  involves
  are you take the precursor component  have a lipid
  to get these individual lipid molecules  they're completely happy
  and you put them into a different  solution and they're no longer happy
  and they start rather than being  individual lipid molecules
  they start to Guam up together in the  liposomes these
  the spherical such
  containers if you will the problem with  that is when you pour that in
  you mix those two fluid there's no way  in heck
  you can mix this the fluids exactly the  same
  over and over again when you do it with  psych test tubes tied things
  just it's just physics aren't there so  I'm gonna show you this maybe
  I'll see if this works work in my  kitchen last night so wanna do isn't
  accrued uncontrolled mixing up to  solutions
  these are non-toxic
  pro one of them I know you've eaten  young
  the soak your feet in so we have a clear  solution
  and I'm just gonna it without any  control
  were in my second solution it's gonna  make the ions in this solution and happy
  and they're gonna do turned Road
  and then I'm gonna pass this around
  and you can look at
  how different the sizes are the chunks  in there
  are huge different sizes by the way that  epson salt and baking soda
  so and water
  so what you have to do is when you mix  the lipids and you get is
  crap is John this is that you have to  process it to make them all the same
  size
  because it's critical the same size  because when you put them into a person
  you want them to be other controlled  size in the same size
  otherwise well the first were you clog  the plumbing
  actually in an embolism om
  the other thing is that they'll get  cleared by the renal filtration system
  with the liver or the loans or the  spleen depending on the size
  they can trigger an immune response they  can do all sorts of nasty things
  so you get this gizmo here that's a
  weighs about 50 kilograms it's about a  cubic meter in size
  and it will basically force these things  through
  membranes that cause im size okay so
  that process takes couple hours
  you have to buy this big box but
  is we
  mix these two things
  in a microfluidic system or in one of  these micro chip Systems
  were able to do the mixing in a  controlled way and do with the same
  every so no longer do I have a
  jar full a John I haven't whatever's  Camino my chip
  isn't controlled size and it's all the  same size
  something to pass this around few  jewelers loops are still there that
  could be useful
  it's gonna look kinda like a while and
  1 I'm sure years that he but it's the  same basic idea we're going to flow in
  are liquid solution flow in another  solution that makes the lipid unhappy
  and they're going to self-assemble into  liposomes
  and so schematically what is happening  is
  were flowing in one fluid in this  direction
  and we flew in our second fluid in this  direction
  and they stir to mix it this interface  but rather than mixing in the big
  splashy
  crazy way they're mixing in a very the
  nice and so what's the application
  to this com let's take
  medical imaging so this is a a positron  emission tomography or PET scan
  a rat with junkie
  bad loans something like that and what  you see is that
  almost all the the radio pro
  trying to visualize the rat the inject  tracer some kind of a probe into the rap
  arm is getting caught up in the liver  you can kind of make up
  several artery may me something here but
  livers lit up like but
  if we take those use this some device to  make those liposomes
  tiny and have controlled size in we  support them into the rap
  this is my picture by the way
  these are my pictures
  so now what we can see
  on the rats and I we've made the good  liposomes and then this was actually
  made with
  device just like the one that's being  passed around so we're able to make this
  in basically plug the chip directly into  the rat rather than
  making this stuff in this big radio  pharmacy with
  clunky machine
  card to the operating room and then the  patient so you can see we get very clear
  we can see the entered scepter we can  see the femoral artery a crowded artery
  a get a little bit a kidney uptake we  can see it's a boy rap
  and then
  over a period of about four hours that  radio probe starts to dissipate
  and it's actually a also yes
  uptake surrogates its taken in the  bonuses a flow right pro
  so the same reason he's fluoride  toothpaste attacks
  to the bone starting to stick in the  bones the rat
  and its actually sticking in at the  growth plate worst part
  ball to your sister to see the skeleton  at that point you never do
  Askim just do an xray arm
  in I know this was a little bit cursory  com
  but I'm at a time and I think
  okay I don't do this stuff myself by  myself lot of folks who work with
  NIST is a great place really like it  they're material laboratory
  do a lot of work with University  Maryland College Park
  the different NIH institutes and I have  a a burgeoning but
  really growing collaboration with  University
  unique up in Campinas Brazil which is  the biggest universe
  one of these universities in Brazil  Campinas is about two hours west
  all so they in student
  and I get to work
     
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét