The
United States is Still a British Colony.
by Pao Chang.
The United States is Still a British Colony is an excellent book that explores the forbidden
history of the United States and reveals evidence showing that the American people have never
been free from the British Crown. If you have read many of my articles about freedom and
the legal system, you should know I am a supporter of the fact that the Constitution was a deceptive
document from the beginning and that most of the so-called Founding Fathers betrayed
the American people. Furthermore, you should know that Rome still rules the world. After
reading this book thoroughly, you will most likely agree with me.
HE UNITED STATES IS STILL A BRITISH COLONY
(The Book 607 pages)
America Is Still A British Colony
Illuminati III Murdered by The Monarchs
THE UNITED STATES IS STILL A BRITISH COLONY EXTORTING TAXES FOR THE CROWN!
A DOCUMENTARY REVIEW OF CHARTERS AND TREATIES
August 17, 1996
An introduction by the �Informer�
This is the latest from a man who visits me quite often. He and another man researched
my theory that we have never been free from the British Crown. This disc shows the results.
I have states that we will never win in their courts. This shows conclusively why. We have
the hard copy of the treaties that are the footnotes. This predates Schroder�s material,
my research of the 1861 stats by Lincoln that put us under the War Powers confiscation acts,
and John Nelson�s material. All our material supports that the real Principal, the King
of England, still rules this country through the bankers and why we own no property in
allodium. This is why it is so important to start OUR courts of God�s natural (common)
Law and break away from all the crap they have handed us. This is one reason Virginia
had a law to hang all lawyers but was somehow, by someone, (the King) set aside to let them
operate again. Some good people put in the original 13th amendment so that without the
lawyers the King could not continue his strangle hold on us. James shows how that was quashed
by the King. I am happy that James� research of six months bears out my theory, that most
people would not listen to me, that we are still citizen/subjects under the kings of
England. My article called �Reality� published in the American Bulletin and the article of
mine on the �Atocha case,� wherein Florida in 1981 used it�s sovereignty under the
British crown to try to take away the gold from the wreck found in Florida waters supports
this premise. James makes mention of the Law dictionaries being England�s Law Dict. you
will not is lists the reign of all the Kings of England. It never mentions the reign of
the Presidents of this country. Ever wonder Why? Get this out to as many people as you
can.
The Informer.
The United States is still a British Colony
The trouble with history is, we weren�t there when it took place and it can be changed
to fit someones belief and/or traditions, or it can be taught in the public schools
to favor a political agenda, and withhold many facts. I know you have been taught that
we won the Revolutionary War and defeated the British, but I can prove to the contrary.
I want you to read this paper with an open mind, and allow yourself to be instructed
with the following verifiable facts. You be the judge and don�t let prior conclusions
on your part or incorrect teaching, keep you from the truth.
I too was always taught in school and in studying our history books that our freedom came from
the Declaration of Independence and was secured by our winning the Revolutionary War. I�m
going to discuss a few documents that are included at the end of this paper, in the
footnotes. The first document is the first Charter of Virginia in 1606 (footnote #1).
In the first paragraph, the king of England granted our fore fathers license to settle
and colonize America. The definition for license is as follows.
�In Government Regulation. Authority to do some act or carry on some trade or business,
in its nature lawful but prohibited by statute, except with the permission of the civil authority
or which would otherwise be unlawful.� Bouvier�s Law Dictionary, 1914.
Keep in mind those that came to America from England were British subjects. So you can
better understand what I�m going to tell you, here are the definitions for subject
and citizen.
�In monarchical governments, by subject is meant one who owes permanent allegiance
to the monarch.� Bouvier�s Law Dictionary, 1914.
�Constitutional Law. One that owes allegiance to a sovereign and is governed by his laws.
The natives of Great Britain are subjects of the British government. Men in free governments
are subjects as well as citizens; as citizens they enjoy rights and franchises; as subjects
they are bound to obey the laws. The term is little used, in this sense, in countries
enjoying a republican form of government.� Swiss Nat. Ins. Co. v. Miller, 267 U.S. 42,
45 S. Ct. 213, 214, 69 L.Ed. 504. Blacks fifth Ed.
I chose to give the definition for subject first, so you could better understand what
definition of citizen is really being used in American law. Below is the definition of
citizen from Roman law.
�The term citizen was used in Rome to indicate the possession of private civil rights, including
those accruing under the Roman family and inheritance law and the Roman contract and
property law. All other subjects were peregrines. But in the beginning of the 3d century the
distinction was abolished and all subjects were citizens; 1 sel. Essays in Anglo-Amer.
L. H. 578.� Bouvier�s Law Dictionary, 1914.
The king was making a commercial venture when he sent his subjects to America, and used
his money and resources to do so. I think you would admit the king had a lawful right
to receive gain and prosper from his venture. In the Virginia Charter he declares his sovereignty
over the land and his subjects and in paragraph 9 he declares the amount of gold, silver and
copper he is to receive if any is found by his subjects. There could have just as easily
been none, or his subjects could have been killed by the Indians. This is why this was
a valid right of the king (Jure Coronae, �In right of the crown,� Black�s forth Ed.),
the king expended his resources with the risk of total loss.
If you�ll notice in paragraph 9 the king declares that all his heirs and successors
were to also receive the same amount of gold, silver and copper that he claimed with this
Charter. The gold that remained in the colonies was also the kings. He provided the remainder
as a benefit for his subjects, which amounted to further use of his capital. You will see
in this paper that not only is this valid, but it is still in effect today. If you will
read the rest of the Virginia Charter you will see that the king declared the right
and exercised the power to regulate every aspect of commerce in his new colony. A license
had to be granted for travel connected with transfer of goods (commerce) right down to
the furniture they sat on. A great deal of the king�s declared property was ceded to
America in the Treaty of 1783. I want you to stay focused on the money and the commerce
which was not ceded to America.
This brings us to the Declaration of Independence. Our freedom was declared because the king
did not fulfill his end of the covenant between king and subject. The main complaint was taxation
without representation, which was reaffirmed in the early 1606 Charter granted by the king.
It was not a revolt over being subject to the king of England, most wanted the protection
and benefits provided by the king. Because of the kings refusal to hear their demands
and grant relief, separation from England became the lesser of two evils. The cry of
freedom and self determination became the rallying cry for the colonist. The slogan
�Don�t Tread On Me� was the standard borne by the militias.
The Revolutionary War was fought and concluded when Cornwallis surrendered to Washington
at Yorktown. As Americans we have been taught that we defeated the king and won our freedom.
The next document I will use is the Treaty of 1783, which will totally contradict our
having won the Revolutionary War. (footnote 2).
I want you to notice in the first paragraph that the king refers to himself as prince
of the Holy Roman Empire and of the United States. You know from this that the United
States did not negotiate this Treaty of peace in a position of strength and victory, but
it is obvious that Benjamin Franklin, John Jay and John Adams negotiated a Treaty of
further granted privileges from the king of England. Keep this in mind as you study these
documents. You also need to understand the players of those that negotiated this Treaty.
For the Americans it was Benjamin Franklin Esgr., a great patriot and standard bearer
of freedom. Or was he? His title includes Esquire.
An Esquire in the above usage was a granted rank and Title of nobility by the king, which
is below Knight and above a yeoman, common man. An Esquire is someone that does not do
manual labor as signified by this status, see the below definitions.
�Esquires by virtue of their offices; as justices of the peace, and others who bear
any office of trust under the crown�.for whosever studieth the laws of the realm, who
studieth in the universities, who professeth the liberal sciences, and who can live idly,
and without manual labor, and will bear the port, charge, and countenance of a gentleman,
he shall be called master, and shall be taken for a gentleman.� Blackstone Commentaries
p. 561-562
�Esquire � In English Law. A title of dignity next above gentleman, and below knight.
Also a title of office given to sheriffs, serjeants, and barristers at law, justices
of the peace, and others.� Blacks Law Dictionary fourth ed. p. 641
Benjamin Franklin, John Adams and John Jay as you can read in the Treaty were all Esquires
and were the signers of this Treaty and the only negotiators of the Treaty. The representative
of the king was David Hartley Esqr..
Benjamin Franklin was the main negotiator for the terms of the Treaty, he spent most
of the War traveling between England and France. The use of Esquire declared his and the others
British subjection and loyalty to the crown.
In the first article of the Treaty most of the kings claims to America are relinquished,
except for his claim to continue receiving gold, silver and copper as gain for his business
venture. Article 3 gives Americans the right to fish the waters around the United States
and its rivers. In article 4 the United States agreed to pay all bona fide debts. If you
will read my other papers on money you will understand that the financiers were working
with the king. Why else would he protect their interest with this Treaty?
I wonder if you have seen the main and obvious point? This Treaty was signed in 1783, the
war was over in 1781. If the United States defeated England, how is the king granting
rights to America, when we were now his equal in status? We supposedly defeated him in the
Revolutionary War! So why would these supposed patriot Americans sign such a Treaty, when
they knew that this would void any sovereignty gained by the Declaration of Independence
and the Revolutionary War? If we had won the Revolutionary War, the king granting us our
land would not be necessary, it would have been ours by his loss of the Revolutionary
War. To not dictate the terms of a peace treaty in a position of strength after winning a
war; means the war was never won. Think of other wars we have won, such as when we defeated
Japan. Did McArther allow Japan to dictate to him the terms for surrender? No way! All
these men did is gain status and privilege granted by the king and insure the subjection
of future unaware generations. Worst of all, they sold out those that gave their lives
and property for the chance to be free.
When Cornwallis surrendered to Washington he surrendered the battle, not the war. Read
the Article of Capitulation signed by Cornwallis at Yorktown (footnote 3)
Jonathan Williams recorded in his book, Legions of Satan, 1781, that Cornwallis revealed to
Washington during his surrender that �a holy war will now begin on America, and when
it is ended America will be supposedly the citadel of freedom, but her millions will
unknowingly be loyal subjects to the Crown.��.�in less than two hundred years the whole nation
will be working for divine world government. That government that they believe to be divine
will be the British Empire.�
All the Treaty did was remove the United States as a liability and obligation of the king.
He no longer had to ship material and money to support his subjects and colonies. At the
same time he retained financial subjection through debt owed after the Treaty, which
is still being created today; millions of dollars a day. And his heirs and successors
are still reaping the benefit of the kings original venture. If you will read the following
quote from Title 26, you will see just one situation where the king is still collecting
a tax from those that receive a benefit from him, on property which is purchased with the
money the king supplies, at almost the same percentage:
-CITE-
26 USC Sec. 1491
HEAD-
Sec. 1491. Imposition of tax
-STATUTE-
There is hereby imposed on the transfer of property by a citizen or resident of the United
States, or by a domestic corporation or partnership, or by an estate or trust which is not a foreign
estate or trust, to a foreign corporation as paid-in surplus or as a contribution to
capital, or to a foreign estate or trust, or to a foreign partnership, an excise tax
equal to 35 percent of the excess of �
(1) the fair market value of the property so transferred, over
(2) the sum of �
(A) the adjusted basis (for determining gain) of such property in the hands of the transferor,
plus
(B) the amount of the gain recognized to the transferor at the time of the transfer.
-SOURCE-
(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 365; Oct. 4, 1976, Pub. L. 94-455, title X, Sec. 1015(a),
90 Stat. 1617; Nov. 6, 1978, Pub. L. 95-600, title VII, Sec. 701(u)(14)(A), 92 Stat. 2919.)
-MISC1-
AMENDMENTS
1978 � Pub. L. 95-600 substituted �estate or trust� for �trust� wherever appearing.
1976 � Pub. L. 94-455 substituted in provisions preceding par.
(1) �property� for �stocks and securities� and �35 percent� for �27 1/2 percent�
and in par.
(1) �fair market value� for �value� and �property� for �stocks and securities�
and in par.
(2) designated existing provisions as subpar. (A) and added subpar. (B).
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1978 AMENDMENT
Section 701(u)(14)(C) of Pub. L. 95-600 provided that: �The amendments made by this paragraph
(amending this section and section 1492 of this title) shall apply to transfers after
October 2, 1975.�
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1976 AMENDMENT
Section 1015(d) of Pub. L. 94-455 provided that: �The amendments made by this section
(enacting section 1057 of this title, amending this section and section 1492 of this title,
and renumbering former section 1057 as 1058 of this title) shall apply to transfers of
property after October 2, 1975.�
A new war was declared when the Treaty was signed. The king wanted his land back and
he knew he would be able to regain his property for his heirs with the help of his world financiers.
Here is a quote from the king speaking to Parliament after the Revolutionary War had
concluded.
(Six weeks after) the capitulation of Yorktown, the king of Great Britain, in his speech to
Parliament (Nov. 27, 1781), declared �That he should not answer the trust committed to
the sovereign of a free people, if he consented to sacrifice either to his own desire of peace,
or to their temporary ease and relief, those essential rights and permanent interests,
upon the maintenance and preservation of which the future strength and security of the country
must forever depend.� The determined language of this speech, pointing to the continuance
of the American war, was echoed back by a majority of both Lords and Commons.
In a few days after (Dec. 12), it was moved in the House of Commons that a resolution
should be adopted declaring it to be their opinion �That all farther attempts to reduce
the Americans to obedience by force would be ineffectual, and injurious to the true
interests of Great Britain.� The rest of the debate can be found in (footnote 4). What
were the true interests of the king? The gold, silver and copper.
The new war was to be fought without Americans being aware that a war was even being waged,
it was to be fought by subterfuge and key personnel being placed in key positions. The
first two parts of �A Country Defeated In Victory,� go into detail about how this
was done and exposes some of the main players.
Every time you pay a tax you are transferring your labor to the king, and his heirs and
successors are still receiving interest from the original American Charters.
The following is the definition of tribute (tax). �A contribution which is raised by
a prince or sovereign from his subjects to sustain the expenses of the state. A sum of
money paid by an inferior sovereign or state to a superior potentate, to secure the friendship
or protection of the latter.� Blacks Law Dictionary forth ed. p. 1677
As further evidence, not that any is needed, a percentage of taxes that are paid are to
enrich the king/queen of England. For those that study Title 26 you will recognize IMF,
which means Individual Master File, all tax payers have one. To read one you have to be
able to break their codes using file 6209, which is about 467 pages. On your IMF you
will find a blocking series, which tells you what type of tax you are paying. You will
probably find a 300-399 blocking series, which 6209 says is reserved. You then look up the
BMF 300-399, which is the Business Master File in 6209. You would have seen prior to
1991, this was U.S.-U.K. Tax Claims, non-refile DLN. Meaning everyone is considered a business
and involved in commerce and you are being held liable for a tax via a treaty between
the U.S. and the U.K., payable to the U.K.. The form that is supposed to be used for this
is form 8288, FIRPTA � Foreign Investment Real Property Tax Account, you won�t find
many people using this form, just the 1040 form. The 8288 form can be found in the Law
Enforcement Manual of the IRS, chapter 3. If you will check the OMB�s paper � Office
of Management and Budget, in the Department of Treasury, List of Active Information Collections,
Approved Under Paperwork Reduction Act, you will find this form under OMB number 1545-0902,
which says U.S. withholding tax-return for dispositions by foreign persons of U.S. real
property interests-statement of withholding on dispositions, by foreign persons, of U.S.
Form #8288 #8288a
These codes have since been changed to read as follows; IMF 300-309, Barred Assement,
CP 55 generated valid for MFT-30, which is the code for 1040 form. IMF 310-399 reserved,
the BMF 300-309 reads the same as IMF 300-309. BMF 390-399 reads U.S./U.K. Tax Treaty Claims.
The long and short of it is nothing changed, the government just made it plainer, the 1040
is the payment of a foreign tax to the king/queen of England. We have been in financial servitude
since the Treaty of 1783.
Another Treaty between England and the United States was Jay�s Treaty of 1794 (footnote
5). If you will remember from the Paris Treaty of 1783, John Jay Esqr. was one of the negotiators
of the Treaty. In 1794 he negotiated another Treaty with Britain. There was great controversy
among the American people about this Treaty.
In Article 2 you will see the king is still on land that was supposed to be ceded to the
United States at the Paris Treaty. This is 13 years after America supposedly won the
Revolutionary War. I guess someone forgot to tell the king of England. In Article 6,
the king is still dictating terms to the United States concerning the collection of debt and
damages, the British government and World Bankers claimed we owe. In Article 12 we find
the king dictating terms again, this time concerning where and with who the United States
could trade. In Article 18 the United States agrees to a wide variety of material that
would be subject to confiscation if Britain found said material going to its enemies ports.
Who won the Revolutionary War?
That�s right, we were conned by some of our early fore fathers into believing that
we are free and sovereign people, when in fact we had the same status as before the
Revolutionary War. I say had, because our status is far worse now than then. I�ll
explain.
Early on in our history the king was satisfied with the interest made by the Bank of the
United States. But when the Bank Charter was canceled in 1811 it was time to gain control
of the government, in order to shape government policy and public policy. Have you never asked
yourself why the British, after burning the White House and all our early records during
the War of 1812, left and did not take over the government. The reason they did, was to
remove the greatest barrier to their plans for this country. That barrier was the newly
adopted 13th Amendment to the United States Constitution. The purpose for this Amendment
was to stop anyone from serving in the government who was receiving a Title of nobility or honor.
It was and is obvious that these government employees would be loyal to the granter of
the Title of nobility or honor.
The War of 1812 served several purposes. It delayed the passage of the 13th Amendment
by Virginia, allowed the British to destroy the evidence of the first 12 states ratification
of this Amendment, and it increased the national debt, which would coerce the Congress to reestablish
the Bank Charter in 1816 after the Treaty of Ghent was ratified by the Senate in 1815.
Forgotten Amendment
The Articles of Confederation, Article VI states: �nor shall the united States in
Congress assembled, or any of them, grant any Title of nobility.�
The Constitution for the united States, in Article, I Section 9, clause 8 states: �No
Title of nobility shall be granted by the united States; and no Person holding any Office
or Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any
present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign
State.�
Also, Section 10, clause 1 states, �No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or
Confederation; grant Letters of Marque or Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit;
make any Thing but Gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill
of Attainder, ex post facto of Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any
Title of nobility.�
There was however, no measurable penalty for violation of the above Sections, Congress
saw this as a great threat to the freedom of Americans, and our Republican form of government.
In January 1810 Senator Reed proposed the Thirteenth Amendment, and on April 26, 1810
was passed by the Senate 26 to 1 (1st-2nd session, p. 670) and by the House 87 to 3
on May 1, 1810 (2nd session, p. 2050) and submitted to the seventeen states for ratification.
The Amendment reads as follows:
�If any citizen of the United States shall Accept, claim, receive or retain any title
of nobility or honor, or shall, without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any
present, pension, office or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince
or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and
shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.�
From An �American Dictionary of the English Language, 1st Edition,� Noah Webster, (1828)
defines nobility as: �3. The qualities which constitute distinction of rank in civil society,
according to the customs or laws of the country; that eminence or dignity which a man derives
from birth or title conferred, and which places him in an order above common men.�; and,
�4. The persons collectively who enjoy rank above commoners; the peerage.�
The fore-mentioned Sections in the Constitution for the united States, and the above proposed
Thirteenth Amendment sought to prohibit the above definition, which would give any advantage
or privilege to some citizens an unequal opportunity to achieve or exercise political power. Thirteen
of the seventeen states listed below understood the importance of this Amendment.
For more infomation >> #AbrahamHicks Best § It's not supposed to take long § Daily #LawofAttraction Video Workshop Sessions - Duration: 11:36. 
For more infomation >> Dr. Graf Skin Deep Neck Throat Peel Twin Pack - Duration: 7:00. 
For more infomation >> Dr. Jeannette Graf, M.D. Collagen 5piece Kit - Duration: 12:02. 
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét