Waching daily Jun 28 2017

MARTIN SHKRELI, THE INFAMOUS PHARMA BRO, IS ABOUT TO STAND

TRIAL, AND OF COURSE THE FIRST PART OF THE TRIAL IS JURY

SELECTION.

HOWEVER, THEY ARE HAVING A REALLY HARD TIME FINDING

THE RIGHT JURORS, BECAUSE PEOPLE AREN'T CURRENTLY BIASED

AGAINST HIM.

IN FACT, PEOPLE DON'T EVEN KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT HIM, SEE HIS

FACE AND THINK THAT HE LOOKS LIKE A CROOK, AND THAT THEY

CANNOT GET PAST THAT IN ORDER TO RULE IN AN UNBIASED FASHION.

TO GIVE YOU THE DETAILS; MORE THAN 120 POTENTIAL JURORS WERE

DISMISSED MONDAY FROM THE FEDERAL COURT TRIAL IN BROOKLYN,

WHERE HE FACES EIGHT COUNTS OF SECURITIES AND WIRE FRAUD

RELATED TO HIS TWO HEDGE FUNDS, AND HIS DRUG COMPANY.

THIS ISN'T EVEN RELATED TO HIS DRUG COMPANY THAT HE HAD, KNOWN

AS TOURING PHARMACEUTICALS, WHERE HE SAID THAT FAMOUS DRUG

PRICE HIKE, FROM THREE DOLLARS FOR DESCENT RATE FELL TO $750 A

PILL, SO HE IS A BAD DUDE.

WHEN THE POTENTIAL JURORS WERE QUESTIONED ABOUT HIM, HERE ARE

SOME OF THE QUOTES, OR STATEMENTS THAT THEY MADE:

ONE JUROR SAID, "THIS IS THE PRICE GOUGE OR OF DRUGS.

MY KIDS ARE ON SOME OF THESE DRUGS.

THIS IMPACTS MY KIDS."

GONE.

GONE.

I LIKE THE JURY SYSTEM, I KNOW THAT IT'S NOT OFTEN TIMES

POPULAR OPINION, BUT I LIKE FACING A JURY OF MY PEERS,

BUT IT'S KIND OF A WEIRD SITUATION WHERE, IF YOU ARE

PERSONALLY AFFECTED BY THIS, AND HENCE UNDERSTAND IT BETTER

THAN ANYONE ELSE, YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED ON THE JURY.

THEY CONSIDER IT BIAS.

I WOULD CONSIDER IT A VERY LEGITIMATE PERSPECTIVE, BUT

THOSE GUYS ARE GONE.

LET ME GIVE YOU A FEW OTHER EXAMPLES OF PEOPLE WHO WILL

NOT BE ON THE JURY.

MANY JURORS SEEM TO SEE SHKRELI AS THE FACE OF CORPORATE GREED

IN AMERICA, THAT IS WHAT ONE INDIVIDUAL SAID.

ANOTHER SAID, "I THINK HE'S A VERY EVIL MAN.

I DON'T THINK I CAN BE FAIR.

MY OPINION IS PRE-WELL-INFORMED, I WOULDN'T WANT TO SERVE ON THIS

JURY."

HE'S SAYING THAT HIS OPINION IS FORMED.

I'M SORRY, FORMED.

I WOULD RELEASE HIM, ONE DUDE THINKS HE IS EVIL BEFORE

THE TRIAL EVEN STARTS.

NOT EVERYONE WHO WAS A POTENTIAL JUROR NEW WHO HE WAS, THEY

DON'T NECESSARILY FOLLOW THE NEWS, BUT THEY SEEM ñ

BUT THEY SEEM TO HAVE A BIAS AGAINST HIM BASED ON FACE ALONE,

AND THAT WAS A PRETTY CREDIBLE COMPONENTS TO THIS STORY.

SO, ONE PERSON DIDN'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THIS STORY

SAID, "I LOOKED RIGHT AT HIM, AND IN MY SAID THAT'S IN MY

HEAD I SAID, THAT'S A SNAKE ñ NOT KNOWING WHO HE WAS."

SOME MIGHT SAY, ISN'T THAT A LITTLE UNFAIR?

BUT HE CAN'T EVEN TAKE A SINGLE PICTURE WITHOUT LOOKING LIKE A

SMUG PRICK.

IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE ME, LET'S GO TO GRAPHIC 9.

LET'S GO TO GRAPHIC 10.

HE JUST ALWAYS HAS THIS ñ

YEAH, HE DOESN'T HAVE TO MAKE THAT FACE.

LOOK AT THAT FACE, WHY DOES HE MAKE THAT BASE?

IT'S LIKE HE WANTS PEOPLE TO HATE HIM.

IT'S NOT THE CONTOURS OF HIS FACE, IT'S THE LOOK THAT HE

CONSTANTLY HAS, LIKE HA HA, I'M SCREWING YOU SOMEHOW.

IT'S THE EXPRESSION.

YEAH, AND THEN MY FAVORITE QUOTE ñ

AGAIN, THIS WAS A PERSON WHO DID NOT KNOW WHAT ABOUT HIM PRIOR TO

JURY SELECTION ñ ONE MAN SAID, "HE KIND OF LOOKS LIKE A DICK."

HE WAS LET ONTO THE JURY BECAUSE THE JUDGE FOUND THAT

STATEMENT TO BE ACCURATE.

NO, HE WASN'T.

SHKRELI MIGHT HAVE A TOUGH TIME IN THIS CASE, PARTLY

BECAUSE HE IS WRONG.

I TOLD YOU, I BELIEVE IN THE JURY SYSTEM, THEY CAN SENSE

THAT THIS GUY IS WHO HE ACTUALLY IS.

YEAH, LOOK, WE OBVIOUSLY COVERED HIM, AND WE KNOW THAT HE IS

NOT A GREAT PERSON; HOWEVER, I THINK EVERYONE, REGARDLESS

OF WHO THEY ARE, DESERVES A FAIR TRIAL, AND SO I DO HOPE

THAT THEY FIND JURORS WHO ARE NOT IMMEDIATELY BIASED

AGAINST HIM, AND I HOPE JUSTICE IS SERVED.

THAT'S MY TAKE ON IT.

IF YOU SAY SO.

NO, OF COURSE!

OF COURSE.

I KNOW SHKRELI MIGHT BE A UNIQUE CASE, BUT OVERALL DON'T MAKE

JUDGMENTS ABOUT PEOPLE BASED ON THEIR FACE.

BELIEVE ME, YOU WILL HAVE 20 OF EVIDENCE

TO DECIDE THAT HE IS A

DICK ANYWAY.

For more infomation >> Pharma Bro's Jury Selection Is HILARIOUS - Duration: 4:44.

-------------------------------------------

Jason Chaffetz: Congress Needs Housing Stipend - Duration: 8:40.

JASON CHAFFETZ HAS BEEN KNOWN FOR HIS AGGRESSIVE NATURE

IN REFORMING ENTITLEMENTS.

HE THINKS THAT PEOPLE NEED TO PICK THEMSELVES UP BY THE

BOOTSTRAPS, WHICH IS A CURIOUS POSITION TO TAKE, CONSIDERING

THE FACT THAT HE JUST DID AN INTERVIEW WITH THE HILL WHERE

HE ARGUED, YOU KNOW, HOUSING IS REALLY EXPENSIVE, ESPECIALLY

IN DC, AND MEMBERS OF CONGRESS SHOULD GET A SECOND EVERY MONTH,

JUST SO THAT THEY CAN BE ABLE TO AFFORD HOUSING IN THE DISTRICT.

OH MY GOD.

THIS STORY, THIS IS BANANAS.

MONEY GIVE YOU HIS QUOTES, AND THEN I'M GOING TO GIVE YOU

A LITTLE CONTEXT.

HE TELLS THE HILL, "I REALLY DO BELIEVE CONGRESS WOULD BE

MUCH BETTER SERVED IF THERE WAS A HOUSING ALLOWANCE FOR

MEMBERS OF CONGRESS.

IN TODAY'S CLIMATE, NOBODY IS GOING TO VOTE ñ

NOBODY IS GOING TO SUGGEST ORVAL FOR A PAY RAISE.

BUT YOU SHOULDN'T HAVE TO BE AMONG THE WEALTHIEST OF

AMERICANS TO SERVE PROPERLY IN CONGRESS."

I'M GOING TO STOP RIGHT THERE.

I DON'T KNOW IF THESE ARE HIS INTENTIONS, BUT I'D STIPEND

IS TAXED DIFFERENTLY THAN A PAY RAISE.

A STIPEND USUALLY MEANS THAT YOU HAVE TO PAY SOCIAL SECURITY TAX.

IT'S EVEN BETTER THAN A PAY RAISE.

I MEAN, THE BALLS ON THIS GUY.

HE WANTS A $2500 A MONTH STIPEND FOR LAWMAKERS, BECAUSE THE

INSANE SALARY THAT THEY ARE MAKING IS ENOUGH.

AND BY THE WAY, WHEN I SAY INSANE, IT'S INSANE TO ME, AND

MOST AMERICANS, BECAUSE MOST PEOPLE DON'T MAKE $174,000 A

YEAR, AND THAT'S NOT INCLUDING DONATIONS, AND THINGS LIKE

THAT, BUT I'M SURE HE BENEFITS FROM AS WELL.

BUT ANYWAY, LET ME GIVE YOU MORE DETAILS;

HE SAYS, "WASHINGTON DC IS ONE OF THE MOST EXPENSIVE PLACES IN

THE WORLD, AND I FLAT-OUT CANNOT AFFORD A MORTGAGE IN UTAH,

KIDS IN COLLEGE AND A SECOND PLACE HERE IN WASHINGTON DC.

8TH ñ I THINK A $2500

HOUSING ALLOWANCE WOULD BE APPROPRIATE AND A REAL HELP TO

HAVE AT LEAST A DECENT QUALITY OF LIFE IN WASHINGTON IF YOU'RE

GOING TO EXPECT PEOPLE TO SPEND HUNDREDS OF NIGHTS A YEAR HERE."

WAIT A MINUTE, YOU ARE WORRIED ABOUT A DECENT QUALITY OF LIFE,

WHEN YOU DENY AMERICANS ñ WHO YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO BE

REPRESENTING - A DECENT QUALITY OF LIFE?

PICK YOURSELF UP BY THE BOOTSTRAPS, DUDE.

IF JASON CHAFFETZ WAS A CHAMPION OF THE POOR, OR EVEN THE MIDDLE

CLASS!

IF HE SAID, WE NEED TO, YOU KNOW, MAKE SURE THAT IF YOU

DON'T HAVE MONEY YOU GET A STIPEND FOR FOOD, SO YOUR

KIDS DON'T STARVE.

AND THEN HE ASKS FOR A STIPEND ON HIS OWN, I WOULD SAY,

WELL LOOK, JASON, YOU ARE MAKING $174,000

A YEAR, THAT'S A HELL OF A LOT BETTER THAN THESE PEOPLE ON

FOOD STAMPS, BUT I WILL HEAR YOU OUT.

BUT NO, HE FIGHTS AGAINST ALL OF THOSE PROGRAMS, SO IF YOU ARE

MIDDLE-CLASS, DOES JASON WANT YOU TO GET A STIPEND?

HELL NO.

YOU ARE POOR, WORKING TWO JOBS, DOES HE WANT YOU TO GET AN

INCREASE IN MINIMUM WAGE?

HELL NO, THAT'S MONEY YOU NEED TO EARN.

FOOD STAMPS?

ANYTHING?

STIPEND?

NO, BOOTSTRAPS.

BUT NOW, I'VE GOT MY CROCODILE TEARS.

HOW AM I SUPPOSED PUT MY KIDS THROUGH PRIVATE SCHOOL?

I WOULDN'T WANT THEM TO GO TO SCHOOL WITH YOUR KIDS.

IT GETS BETTER THOUGH, JASON CHAFFETZ LOVES TO GO ON PUBLIC

TELEVISION TO TALK ABOUT INDIVIDUALS IN AMERICA WHO ARE

NEEDY, WHO DO NEED PUBLIC ASSISTANCE, AND HE DID MAKE NEWS

EARLIER THIS YEAR WHEN HE SAID THIS, TAKE A LOOK:

AND YOU KNOW WHAT?

AMERICANS HAVE CHOICES, AND THEY HAVE GOT TO MAKE A CHOICE,

SO MAYBE INSTEAD OF GETTING A NEW IPHONE THAT THEY LOVE,

MAYBE THEY SHOULD INVEST IN THEIR OWN HEALTHCARE.

THEY HAVE GOT TO MAKE THOSE DECISIONS THEMSELVES.

YEAH BRO, STOP BUYING YOUR IPHONE AND YOU'LL BE OLD TO

AFFORD A HOME OR SOMETHING IN DC.

JUST DON'T BUY THE IPHONE.

BECAUSE AVOIDING PURCHASING TECHNOLOGY LIKE AN IPHONE IS

GOING TO SOMEHOW MAGICALLY GIVE YOU ENOUGH MONEY TO PROVIDE FOR

YOUR FAMILY, TO AFFORD HEALTHCARE, TO AFFORD AN

EXPENSIVE HOME IN WASHINGTON DC.

I MEAN, THIS GUY IS A CLOWN, AND THE INABILITY TO EVER

EMPATHIZE WITH ANYONE ELSE, WHILE ARGUING THAT MEMBERS

OF CONGRESS SHOULD GET THIS INSANE AMOUNT OF MONEY

ñ $30,000 A YEAR JUST FOR HOUSING ñ IS JUST RIDICULOUS.

AND THAT IS, AGAIN, AS YOU POINT OUT, POST TAXES.

IF YOU HAVE TO PAY TAXES ON THAT, YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT A

$45,000, $50,000 YEAR JOB, WHICH IS MORE THAN THE AVERAGE

AMERICAN GETS FOR THEIR ENTIRE YEAR AT A JOB.

YOU KNOW, IF YOU ARE ON MINIMUM WAGE YOU MAKE AROUND $20,000?

SO HE IS ASKING FOR MORE THAN TWICE THE MINIMUM WAGE, JUST

FOR HIS HOUSING, BECAUSE HOW ELSE COULD HE AFFORD TO HOMES?

ONE IN UTAH, ONE IN WASHINGTON, WHILE HIS KIDS ARE IN

PRIVATE SCHOOL.

BUT YOU, YOU WANT TO GET HEALTHCARE SO YOU CAN LIVE?

DON'T BUY YOUR IPHONE.

I KNOW, IT'S CRAZY.

AND BY THE WAY, SINCE WE ARE ON THE TOPIC OF MINIMUM WAGE, WHAT

DOES CHAFFETZ THINK ABOUT INCREASING MINIMUM WAGE?

HERE'S AN INTERVIEW HE DID BACK IN 2014.

IT ALSO SAYS AN AVERAGE OF 90,000 AMERICANS WOULD BE

LIFTED OUT OF POVERTY, AND WOULD HAVE MORE PURCHASING POWER

BIRTH AND ADDITIONAL $5 BILLION IN THEIR POCKETS.

QU…BEC UNIVERSITY FOUND THAT 71% OF AMERICANS, INCLUDING A

52% OF REPUBLICAN SUPPORT A HIGHER MINIMUM WAGE.

WHERE DO YOU STAND ON THAT?

ABSOLUTELY NOT, I WOULD TOTALLY DISAGREE WITH THAT.

THE IDEA THAT WE LOSE $500,000 IS DEVASTATING TO PEOPLE,

AND ONE PART OF THE CONVERSATION I REALLY THINK NEEDS TO BE

INJECTED IN THIS IS, WHAT WOULD IT DO TO OUR YOUTH?

I REMEMBER AS A YOUNG MAN, I DIDN'T MAKE MINIMUM WAGE,

BUT I HAD TO GET A JOB, AND I LEARNED THE VALUE OF HARD WORK.

AND WHEN YOU RAISE THE MINIMUM WAGE, YOU WANT TO SQUEEZE

OUT THE VALUE ñ ESPECIALLY IN INNER CITIES, YOUNG FOLKS

NEED JOBS AND THEY HAVE GOT TO LEARN HOW TO WORK.

A COUPLE POINTS ABOUT THIS, WE JUST DID A STORY ABOUT HOW

SEATTLE RAISE THEIR MINIMUM WAGE, NOT LIKING THAT STORY

WHERE THEY WERE TALKING ABOUT $10, BUT TO $15, AND THEY DIDN'T

LOSE ANY JOBS.

THE FACTS SHOW, IN FACT, THAT THE ECONOMY DID BETTER.

AND HE SAYS, KIDS IN THE INNER-CITY, BECAUSE OF

COURSE THE POOR ARE ALWAYS IN THE INNER-CITY.

HE DIDN'T HAVE TO SAY INNER-CITY, WHERE DID THAT

COME FROM?

SO WHEN IT COMES TO YOU, NO NO NO, ABSOLUTELY NOT.

AND THAT IS NOT A STIPEND, THAT IS NOT A HANDOUT, YOU ARE

WORKING HARD, BUT JASON CHAFFETZ SAYS NO, YOU SHOULD NOT GET MORE

THAN $7.25 AN HOUR, BUT HIM, HE NEEDS A $30,000 STIPEND FOR HIS

SECOND HOME.

FOR HIS SECOND HOME IN DC, JUST SO HE CAN DO HIS JOB PROPERLY,

BECAUSE IN THE PAST, MEMBERS OF CONGRESS HAVEN'T BEEN ABLE TO DO

THEIR JOB PROPERLY, SIMPLY BECAUSE THEY WEREN'T GIVEN THIS

CHUNK OF CASH TO BE ABLE TO AFFORD A HOME IN DC.

BY THE WAY, YESTERDAY WE DID A STORY ABOUT HOW AS MANY AS

14% OF COLLEGE STUDENTS ARE HOMELESS, OR PRECARIOUSLY

HOUSED, MEANING THEY ARE LIVING OUT OF THEIR CARS.

IS HE CONCERNED ABOUT THAT?

HE'S NOT CONCERNED ABOUT THAT, BUT HE'S CONCERNED ABOUT

BEING ABLE TO AFFORD THAT SECOND HOME IN DC.

BUT SUCKLE MINIMUM WAGE REALLY QUICK, JUST TO GIVE YOU THE

NUMBERS.

THE CURRENT MINIMUM WAGE IN DC IS $11.50.

SO, THAT ENDS UP BEING A $23,900 SALARY PER YEAR.

THAT IS STILL NOT BE $30,000

HE IS ASKING FOR IN THE FORM OF A STIPEND.

KEEP IN MIND, THE MINIMUM WAGE IS EXPECTED TO INCREASE

BEGINNING JULY 1, 2017 THIS YEAR, DO OVER $12,

BUT THAT WILL LEAD TO A YEARLY SALARY OF $26,000.

I KNOW I ALREADY SAID THIS, BUT LET ME REPEAT: CHAFFETZ HAS A

YEARLY SALARY OF $134,000, AND KEEP IN MIND THAT HIS NET WORTH,

OFFICIALLY ñ WE DON'T KNOW HIS REAL NET WORTH ñ IS $308,000.

BUT YOU, DON'T BUY AN IPHONE.

HE NEEDS A SECOND HOME, SO OF COURSE HE NEEDS MORE

GOVERNMENT ASSISTANCE, ON TOP OF HIS GOVERNMENT SALARY.

BUT REMEMBER HOW BAD BIG GOVERNMENT IS.

OF COURSE, THAT'S WHEN IT'S TRYING TO HELP YOU.

IF IT'S HELPING HIM, THEN ALL OF A SUDDEN HE LOVES BIG

GOVERNMENT.

For more infomation >> Jason Chaffetz: Congress Needs Housing Stipend - Duration: 8:40.

-------------------------------------------

Love Island viewers have a bizarre conspiracy theory about Jonny and once you see it - Duration: 1:59.

Love Island viewers have a bizarre conspiracy theory about Jonny and once you see it, you can't unsee it

Poor Jonny had a bit of a hard time during last nights episode of Love Island. After enjoying a few days of rekindled romance with Camilla, viewers thought things were back on track for the pair.

But his fellow islanders suddenly turned against him, saying he isnt real and they barely ever see him talking to Camilla during the daytime.

While some may say hes shy, others have a theory about why Jonny is keeping his head down - but its a bit of a stretch.

You see, theyve noticed that Jonny looks a lot like a pop star. and some are convinced its really him. Well, have you ever seen Jonny and Will in the same room together?.

Alright, maybe they dont think its definitely him, but youve got to admit they do look very similar. Others think he looks more like Michael Buble.

Viewers panicked last night after it looked like the self-fashioned Jamilla (Jonny and Camilla) were about to get kicked off the island.

The couples were asked to vote for the least compatible islanders and the pair were drawing level with Sam and Chloe. Amber and Kem had the last vote and ended up sending Clam packing.

So Camilla and Jonny (or Will) fans can rest easy for another night.

For more infomation >> Love Island viewers have a bizarre conspiracy theory about Jonny and once you see it - Duration: 1:59.

-------------------------------------------

Documentary 2017 | CUBA: The Battle of America, History Channel Documentary Film - Duration: 59:47.

Documentary 2017 Documentary 2017 History Documentary 2017 America