Welcome friends to another edition of  Economic Update weekly program devoted
  to the economic dimensions of our lives,  incomes, jobs, debts, ours, our children's.
  I'm your host Richard Wolff. I've been a  Professor of Economics all my adult life
  preparing me to offer you updates every  week. Before we begin today a couple of
  announcements I think will interest you  I'm happy to mention to those of you in
  the Los Angeles area or who might be  there next weekend that from the 3rd to
  the 5th of November at the Los Angeles  Trade Technical College 400 West
  Washington Street there will be the left  coast forum a replica of the left forum
  that happens every spring in New York  City but its own West Coast variation I
  will be talking the evening of November  3rd but I urge you if you are interested
  if you are in the area this will be a  chance to see what academics what
  activists are doing in the United States  to make the kinds of changes that ever
  more of you are interested in you can  find out more by going either to left
  coast forum or to left forum org and  that will give you all the information
  about the speakers and the panels and  all the activities the other
  announcement is a response to what many  of you have asked for you wanted to know
  how has a Marxian economics an approach  to economics that is critical of
  capitalism how has that evolved in  recent decades what's going on in the
  field of Marxian economics how have  criticisms and proposals to go beyond
  capitalism how are they evolved in that  tradition it's an important question and
  there are plenty of answers but many of  them are gathered together in a new book
  that I thought you might be interested  in
  published by the very large  international publisher known as route
  ledge international or route ledge  publishers based in the United Kingdom
  but globally distributed the book is  called a handbook of Marxian economics
  published this year 2017 so it's right  up to date it's got a group of editors
  who have assembled a whole raft of  different articles on different subjects
  so you can kind of sample the field the  lead editor is David Brennan BRE and na
  n so I recommend if you're interested in  what Marxian economics has to say this
  handbook of Marx in economics edited by  David Brennan and others is a useful way
  to get into this material let's turn  then to the economic updates for this
  week the first one captured my attention  not just because it's a horrible story
  and it is but also because it tells us  something about what's going on in the
  American economy from an angle that you  don't often hear about here's the way
  this story goes across the country towns  and counties are having more and more
  difficulty performing their basic  functions why the answer is not far to
  search for corporations in America have  dozens literally of ways of evading
  their share of taxes wealthy people like  wise either have the laws in place to
  allow them to escape taxation or they by  the political influence that gets them
  those laws we know the story and the end  result is that cities and towns across
  the country are not able to raise the  money.the tax revenue that in the past
  funded basic functions and here's an  example one of the things that cities
  and towns and counties and states have  to do is the handle probation if people
  violate the law anything from a speeding  ticket
  to more serious offenses they can be  found guilty in the judicial system
  and be required for example to pay a  fine and or to undergo probation you
  don't go to prison but you are kind of  in a limbo place you have to really
  behave yourself and do nothing wrong for  a while and then you're done with your
  probation but of course to handle this  system you have to have probation
  officers probation offices all of that  to save money cities and counties and
  states are beginning to privatize  probation and recently in Craighead
  County Arkansas it kind of blew up on  them and attention finally was turned
  here's what it turns out happened in  Craighead County Arkansas but it happens
  everywhere this system becomes corrupted  here's how it works
  the public institution the city to town  the county says we can't afford the
  probation system anymore and instead of  shutting it down which would raise other
  kinds of problems they privatized it  they turn it over to a private probation
  company so here's what happens you  violate the law a speeding ticket the
  judge says you must paid X dollars of  fine and you must be on probation for a
  year 18 months whatever the private  company now administers this if you
  don't pay the exact amount of money on  the right day the private probation
  company has the right to assign fees and  penalties and then to jack it up say you
  now owe not just the original fine but  all on top of that fees and penalties
  why is this different from any other  kind of situation because if you don't
  pay the probation company explains to  you you're going to go to
  now normally in a Western law for  centuries we don't put people with jail
  who haven't paid fines other ways are  found to deal with this problem
  otherwise you're putting poor people  those who miss a payment they all into
  jail and that's what we used to call  poorhouse we don't do that anymore but
  it turns out when a system begins to  break down that the things we didn't do
  anymore  turn up getting done anyway moving right
  along to the second one I found another  statistic this last week that
  illustrates that if there's an economic  recovery going on it doesn't include
  large numbers of people in this case it  has to do with people having their
  electricity shut off because they  haven't paid or paid in full their
  electric bills let me give you some of  the numbers I think they will stun you
  the way they stunned me last summer nine  hundred thousand homes in Texas went
  dark because of unpaid bills that's  triple the number ten years ago in the
  state of Texas number two California 714  thousand homes the most on record for
  the state of California across the  United States as a whole millions of
  people are being disconnected from  electricity and let me remind everyone
  that doesn't just mean that your toaster  isn't working and you can't watch TV it
  means that if you have a child in school  who had an assignment to work with a
  computer to do something he or she can't  do it the ramifications of being cut off
  of electricity have long-term social  consequences that ought to make a
  society stop and pay some attention but  the story actually gets worse the Trump
  administration released its 2018 budget  and in the
  budget they got rid of the lih EAP  program case you don't know what that is
  let me tell you low income Home Energy  Assistance Program it's a program of the
  federal government that helps poor  people if they qualify to pay at least
  part of their electricity bills  last year 2.9 million households Wow
  turned and got some help so why is it  being canceled by the Trump
  administration  well according to Mick Mulvaney the
  director of the US Office of Management  and Budget he cited the figure of eleven
  thousand people who didn't qualify but  who got help now let's see 2.9 million
  people disconnected and needed help  eleven thousand which is 0.0001 percent
  of this cheated in some way weren't  qualified or even dead in some cases is
  there corruption in government programs  usually some but to use a tiny fraction
  of corruption to cancel out what  millions of people need there's no
  justification for that there never was I  want to give you some good news and it's
  about the country called New Zealand  halfway around the world they just have
  a new government led by a 37 year old  woman Jacinda Edurne and she the head of
  the Labour Party there is quite an  interesting candidate she is in charge
  of a coalition government there are two  other parties together with her that
  have formed the government and taken it  away from the last ten years of a
  Conservative government the Conservative  government in when the global capitalist
  crash happened in 2008 and stayed in  power to administer an austerity program
  afterwards the people of New Zealand  have had enough and they abandoned the
  Conservatives  and turned the government over to
  Jacinda Aherne and her coalition  partners here are some of the things she
  ran her election on the election  happened last month in September and so
  we know exactly what she's committed to  her biggest issue was that that was
  shameful in her mind that New Zealand  one of the world's industrialized
  economies has the worst problem of  homelessness of any of them and for her
  she called this a quote unquote failure  of capitalism her words she said you
  judge a system among other things by  whether it provides the most basic needs
  of a population housing is a basic need  to be the number one country for
  homelessness in the world is a failure  of that system in New Zealand she's on
  top to raise the minimum wage to the  equivalent of $11.50 per hour we don't
  have anything remotely like that we  still have a federal minimum wage at
  $7.25 and her coalition partners are  pushing to raise it from 1150 to around
  15 or 16 dollars so there the government  is doing what we still have to have
  millions of people demonstrating out in  front of McDonald's or Walmart's to
  maybe get in a few years a remarkable  turnaround in New Zealand and it's not
  the only country where this is happening
  I want to talk to you also about an  update that has to do with this
  lingering struggle over the Affordable  Care Act otherwise known as Obamacare
  I'm going to assume you are familiar  with what President Trump decided to do
  after he and the Republicans failed to  override that bill in the Congress that
  didn't get enough votes so what  President Trump did was announce
  something that he can do just as  president he will not allow the
  government to give to the insurance  company the promised subsidies for
  low-income people to get health  insurance so here's how this works the
  law mandates that the insurance  companies must give lower rates to
  people who qualify who have little or no  income so that's continuing the
  president cannot stop that what the  president can do is not give to the
  insurance companies the subsidies that  they got to help them pay for the cost
  of giving insurance at a low discounted  rate to poor people
  so here's it's interesting what is the  insurance industry going to do and
  they've made no secret of their plans if  they don't get the subsidies that the
  federal government promised them in the  Affordable Care Act and if they are
  required by law to give a low rate to  poor people then the only way they can
  pull that off they say is one of two  things raise the rates of everybody else
  to compensate them for what they have to  give in a discounted rate to the poor in
  other words set that health insurance  needs of the poor against those of
  everybody else to create the maximum  anger resentment hostility and the
  second option for the insurance  companies quit the whole business
  just cancel everybody out and stop  providing
  some companies are expected to go one  way and some the other the losers the
  mass of the American people it is an  extraordinary exercise in bad government
  not serving the people who elected it to  go in there before turning to the next
  economic update let me remind you to  make use of the two websites that we
  maintain for your use these websites  allow you to follow us on Facebook
  Twitter Instagram to see what we're  doing on YouTube in other words to be a
  partner and share with us the kinds of  work which involved collecting this
  information making these analyses and  then distributing and sharing them with
  other interested people the two websites  are rd wolf with two FS calm and
  democracy at work dot info these are  also websites that allow you to
  communicate with us to tell us what you  like and don't like what you would like
  to see covered we read these emails and  we use them in organizing the
  programming that we offer to you each  week so please make use of both websites
  they're there for your purpose they're  updated many times a day share what you
  find there with others that's why we put  it there Rd wolf with two FS calm and
  democracy at work dot info the next  update has to do as much with who said
  something as with what this person said  person is nageire woods the Dean at
  Oxford University in England one of the  most establishment places you could find
  in the world of economics and here's  what Dean Woods said in the middle of
  October publicly neoliberalism the form  that capitalism has taken in the last
  two or three decades is on trial said  Dean woods in the United Kingdom
  in woods is located Labour Party leader  Jeremy Corbyn accuses neoliberalism of
  increasing homelessness rather like the  new prime minister of New Zealand
  throwing children into poverty and  causing wages to fall in many cases
  below subsistence a quarter of a century  ago it was said that if the government
  intervenes in the economy it makes  matters worse now we see says Dean Woods
  that if you remove the government it can  have the same effect and that therefore
  we have to rethink this and then Dean  woods has the courage to say what so few
  of the people in this kind of a position  dare to say that the fastest-growing
  economic units in the world over the  last ten years have been overwhelmingly
  state managed state interventionist  types of capitalism exactly the opposite
  of what used to be argued China is the  fastest growing but so is India so are
  many other countries and not only are  they growing faster than the neoliberal
  that government gets out of the picture  countries but the government gets out of
  the picture countries like Britain and  the United States are having more and
  more troubles their inequality is  getting worse while that in those other
  countries isn't their child poverty  rates in those hands off from the
  government are getting worse while those  in the government intervention are
  getting better in other words the wind  is changing and where before it was
  popular to say private capitalism is  solution government is the problem it's
  now reversing it's the private  capitalism that's the problem and the
  government intervention that's the  solution this has happened before this
  oscillation between more and less  government intervention
  and it is hugely justified either way  with the same arguments in the 1970s
  Reagan and Thatcher said the  government's too much involved
  everything will get better if we get the  government out and people believed it
  now it's going the other way and people  increasingly are believing it I
  understand the anguish about the bad  performance of neoliberal capitalism
  getting the government out of all kinds  of things is part of what brought us to
  the crash of 2008 so I understand  wanting to push in the other direction
  but I would like to add an analytical  understanding from the history of
  economics maybe the problem isn't more  or less government intervention yes
  that's what the profession  loves to debate but it's an old debate
  and it's a very stale debate because  maybe the problem isn't which form of
  capitalism we got maybe the problem is  that we don't look beyond these two
  forms that we don't seem to be able to  manage to think of an economy as either
  organized into corporations that do  whatever they want or organized into
  corporations that do pretty much what  they want but the government Li limits
  them and controls them and regulates  them maybe we go back and forth between
  the two forms of capitalism  because the problem isn't a form of
  capitalism the problem is capitalism  itself the problem is a system in which
  a tiny group of people the heads of the  big corporation the boards of directors
  the major shareholders pretty much have  the cards in their hands and all we're
  debating is whether the government  limits them a little a little more a
  little less  but maybe the problem isn't the limits
  more or less maybe the problem is we  shouldn't allow a small group of people
  in an economic system to make all the  decisions that everybody else has to
  live with maybe the problem is we don't  have a democratic economic system and we
  never did and we're now facing the music  that pretending that all we have to
  discuss is a little more government  intervention a little less misses the
  boat misses the issue keeps our debate  very narrowly limited instead of open to
  asking the more fundamental questions  the next economic update has to do with
  the way that the United States is  exceptional is unique we are the only
  country among the advanced industrial  countries in the world that does not
  have a federally mandated paid vacation  time in other words there's no law in
  the United States the way there is in  Britain France and Germany and Italy and
  Scandinavia and on and on and on we  don't have the this law which says that
  a working man or woman who goes to work  every week 9:00 to 5:00 Monday to Friday
  all that must be given X number of weeks  of paid vacation a time to relax
  a time to be away from the job a time to  recoup your relationships with your
  children and with your spouse and with  your community to recharge your
  batteries in France it's five weeks I  know the French economy pretty well and
  I know that the French working class  will not give that up without a
  catastrophic struggle it means too much  to them they've built their lives around
  this why is the United States unable  unwilling the working people in other
  countries fought bitterly to get this  time off the American working class
  didn't or at least it didn't yet and the  question is why but there's a bigger
  question which the Europeans now have to  face - because you fought for in the
  past doesn't mean you'll keep it the new  leadership in places like France with
  mr. McRoy are interested in reducing it  maybe even eliminating it it turns out
  that in a modern capitalist system  whatever the working class achieves in
  benefits in job security and wages is  always tentative is mostly temporary why
  because the ultimate decision is not in  their hands they fight for it if they're
  lucky they get it but they're always  facing an employer class who is as
  interested today as it was last month  last year last century in getting it
  back  taking these benefits away reducing them
  all across Europe these benefits like  paid vacation time are being eroded are
  being picked to death it turns out that  if a union or a whole working class
  fights for something with an adversary  employer even when it wins it discovers
  usually not very long later that the  winning is temporary you're always in
  this struggle and the other side is  always looking to take it away that's
  why people get interested in things like  worker coops because then the workers
  are on both sides of the discussion they  are the workers who do the work but they
  are also together their own employer  then there isn't the adversary situation
  and then you don't have to worry that  the other will take it away from you
  after you struggle the last economic  update we'll have time for has to do
  with an entity you've probably never  heard of families for excellent schools
  Fe si who are these people  well they pretend and they do a lot of
  publicity and push this that they  represent a certain point of view among
  parents of schoolchildren and concerned  citizens and so they battle to get
  certain goals particularly recently in  Massachusetts and other states New York
  among them they have been fighting to  expand the freedom of charter school
  to do end runs around the old rules of  what can and cannot happen in a public
  school to employ people who haven't the  qualifications to take shortcuts to
  impose all kinds of quasi ethical  behaviors on teachers and students in
  terms of what public teachers have  gotten but why I am telling you this is
  that it turns out that a new law and a  new research by the Boston Globe in
  Massachusetts found out that a tiny  number of very wealthy people bankroll
  the ready families for excellent schools  and they've been fighting because they
  have interests business interests in  running charter schools in servicing
  charter schools they want privatization  of Education because it's a realm of
  much profit and in America they can  parade themselves as a popular
  organization because they have the money  well their efforts were defeated in
  Massachusetts by a groundswell of  organization from below which raised
  lots of little bits of money from Union  teachers and so on but often the the
  victories go the other way and when that  happens we face a society which allows
  money to trump a democratic  decision-making process that's why
  change is the order of the day we've  come to the end of the first half of
  economic update thank you very much for  being with us stay with us after a short
  intermission we will be right back
  you
     
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét